Connect with us

Politics

OSUN PDP LEGAL TUSSLE: SETTING THE RECORDS STRAIGHT

Published

on

OSUN PDP LEGAL TUSSLE: SETTING THE RECORDS STRAIGHT

OSUN PDP LEGAL TUSSLE: SETTING THE RECORDS STRAIGHT

 

 

 

 

Much as I have tried to refrain from making any comments on the legal tussle within Osun PDP initiated by Hon. Olasoji Adagunodo, I have taken the pains to put up this piece so as to clear some of the controversies, mis-interpretations, mis-applications surrounding the issue and to as well purge the public of the media misgivings. Inundated by calls, messages, visitations as a result of the misinformation which greeted the outcome of yesterday’s ruling delivered by my noble lord, Hon. Justice (Dr). A.A. Aderibigbe, I felt compelled (indeed as a Minister in the temple of justice) to write this piece.

 

 

 

 

OSUN PDP LEGAL TUSSLE: SETTING THE RECORDS STRAIGHT

 

 

 

BACKGROUND FACTS
Hon. Soji Adagunodo was removed as Osun PDP Chairman in the year 2020 and by a resolution of the SEC of Osun PDP which is the appropriate executive committee in this respect, a replacement was made in HON. SUNDAY BISI and same was ratified by the NWC. Hon. Adagunodo or (His Excellency Adagunodo as now preferred by his loyalists to be addressed), instituted an action in HIK/25/2020 praying the court ultimately that he be re-instated as Osun PDP Chairman. By an ex-parte order made on 3rd November, 2020 by my noble lord, Hon. Justice S.O. Falola sitting at Ikirun, Adagunodo was re-instated as the Chairman while Sunday Bisi was removed from office. The Defendants to the suit challenged the order by filing some applications which included preliminary objection, application for setting aside of the order, an appeal and application for stay/injunction pending appeal. On 9th November, the court at Ikirun converted the interim ex-parte order to a Preservative order. The affected parties went on appeal and by a decision rendered on 5th March, 2021, the Court of Appeal set aside the “whole decision” of Hon. Justice Falola. Let me clear this point, the fact that a higher court sets aside the decision of a lower court does not make the lower court a bad judge, It only means that the higher court saw the issue raised from a different angle. In specific terms, the Court of Appeal set aside the mandatory interim order and deprecated conversion of same to a Preservative order. This invariably meant that the interim order should not operate indefinitely as the Preservative order suggested. Infact, the Court of Appeal expressly removed ADAGUNODO by declaring the order of his re-instatement under whatever guise as null and void. Adagunodo appealed the said judgment to the Supreme Court on 14 grounds, and 8 of those grounds questioned the order of the Court of Appeal setting aside the Preservative order. Briefs of arguments were exchanged by parties in respect of the said appeal at the Supreme Court, but later Adagunodo through his counsel withdrew same. The effect of the withdrawal is that the appeal is deemed dismissed, and the judgement of the Court of Appeal removing Adagunodo still subsists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIK/25/2020 proceeded before another noble judge of Osun State High Court and I can confirm to you authoritatively that the matter is still pending because it’s subject of an order for a stay of proceedings pending appeal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MAIN ISSUE

Now, here and there, while not wanting to belabour issue on the several suits filed by Adagunodo at different courts after the Court of Appeal decision, judgment in HIF/36/2021 before my lord Aderibigbe came, to the consternation of the whole world because no ilk of the proceedings was felt until sometime in December, 2021 when tee Group of Osun PDP aspirants (Senator Adeleke not inclusive) brandished same as the vehicle to bring in Wale Ojo (former Osun East Senatorial Chairman) as the Acting Chairman of Osun PDP. For the sake of clarity, the judgment which was delivered on 22nd November, 2021 granted the 5 reliefs prayed for by Adagunodo. The reliefs are paraphrased thus:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. A DECLARATION that a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction is valid and subsisting until set aside by that same court or an appellate court.

 

 

 

 

 

2. A declaration that the Preservative order made by Hon. Justice Falola in HIK/25/2020 is still validly subsisting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. A Declaration that Adagunodo is Osun PDP Chairman based on the order of Preservative order made by Falola J. in HIK/25/2020 pending the final determination of HIK/25/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. A DECLARATION that Adagunodo be recognised as the Chairman of Osun PDP pending the determination of HiK/25/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. An order recognising all the actions taken by Adagunodo as lawful and valid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note that HIK/25/2020 upon which HIF/36/2021 was premised has HON. SUNDAY BISI, HON. AKANFE ATIDADE and HON. BOLA AJAO as parties, however, they were missing as parties in HIF/36/2021. Whether they were given fair hearing or not would be determined by the Court of Appeal and whether the decision in HIF/36/2021 can bind them is an issue to be thrashed out at the appeallate court.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On getting notice of the judgment at Ife, PDP filed an application to have the judgment set aside before that same court. By a considered ruling yesterday the 16th February, 2022, the court refused the application. That was what happened and no more! The option of appeal is promptly being explored by the PDP and by the other parties who were supposed to be joined but not joined at all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, how the judgment of the Osun State High Court sitting in Ife is being deliberately and mischievously interpreted to have pronounced/affirmed Wale Ojo as Osun PDP Chairman is still a mirage and the portion where such pronouncement was made is still at large. Moreover, the judgment declared all actions taken by Adagunodo as valid and lawful, then how that has conferred an advantage on Wale Ojo or any particular group is also unfathomable. What has that got to do with the Congresses already conducted, being conducted and/or about to be conducted by the National Leadership of the Party? Is it the State Chairman of the Party or the State Executive Committee of the Party that conducts Congresses? What a miscarriage of political justice and a misdirection of political sanity! What an outlandish claim!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If I may ask further, in what ways has the Ife judgment displaced the State Executive Committee of the Party? Was there any pronouncement against the Ward Executives of the Party that are already in place as ratified by the National Convention of the Party? I agree that Ife judgment is subsisting (though now subject of an appeal and even appeals, and subject of a stay/injunction pending appeal), can Adagunodo which the judgment recognises be in 2 offices together? At what time did the SEC of OSUN PDP declared any vacancy in the Chairmanship seat and at what time was Wale Ojo brought in as a replacement? This is bad politics which turns logic in the head and lacks reasoning.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONCLUSION
I saw many posts, many comments and even media reportorials which were distortions of fact and in my view amounted to professional misconduct on the part of the media outlets.. Radio, TV, print and electronic media inclusive. Any media house which reported that the court affirmed Wale Ojo as Osun PDP Chairman should take the courage by apologizing to the public and give them the appropriate information. Let them get a copy of the Ife Court judgment and make a return to the general public.

Before I conclude this piece, there is a poser: The Court of Appeal expressly removed ADAGUNODO by declaring the order reinstating him as null and void. That judgment is still subsisting. The appeal was in favour of Sunday Bisi. No appeal is pending in respect of that judgment of the Court of Appeal. Another judgment of the High Court which is lower in rank to the Court of Appeal recognises Adagunodo. The High Court judgment is now subject of live appeals and an application for stay. The said High Court judgment are declaratory and did not make mention of Sunday Bisi or any other member of Osun SWC/SEC, which of the two judgments would you follow if you were in the shoes of OSUN PDP and Hon. Sunday Bisi? It is now a situation of conflicts between a judgment of the Court of Appeal and a judgement of the High Court.

Hashim Abioye Esq.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Politics

Peter Obi Offers to Fulfill Bail Conditions for Dele Farotimi, Advocates Justice

Published

on

Peter Obi Offers to Fulfill Bail Conditions for Dele Farotimi, Advocates Justice

Peter Obi Offers to Fulfill Bail Conditions for Dele Farotimi, Advocates Justice

The global coordinator of the Obidient Movement has announced that Peter Obi, former presidential candidate and leader of the movement, has stepped forward to fulfill the bail conditions for human rights lawyer Dele Farotimi.

Farotimi, a prominent activist known for his bold stance against systemic issues in Nigeria, was recently granted ₦30 million bail by a Federal High Court following charges filed against him. The case has attracted significant public attention, with widespread support for Farotimi from various quarters.

In a statement, the Coordinator revealed that Obi expressed his gratitude to the judiciary and all stakeholders involved in the legal process. The former presidential candidate emphasized the importance of fairness, transparency, and the rule of law in resolving the matter.

The Obidient Movement, known for championing justice and accountability, has remained vocal in its support for Farotimi. The group reiterated its commitment to upholding the principles of justice and transparency in Nigeria’s judicial system.

The next hearing in Farotimi’s case is scheduled for January 2025, with supporters hopeful for a resolution that upholds the integrity of the legal process.

Continue Reading

Politics

Breaking: Speaker Obasa Debunks Allegation Of Spending N17b On Assembly Gate

Published

on

Breaking: Speaker Obasa Debunks Allegation Of Spending N17b On Assembly Gate

Breaking: Speaker Obasa Debunks Allegation Of Spending N17b On Assembly Gate

 

The Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Mudashiru Obasa, on Thursday described the allegation that the House spent N17 billion on the fixing of a gate as spurious and funny.

Breaking: Speaker Obasa Debunks Allegation Of Spending N17b On Assembly Gate

A self-proclaimed group, Lagos State Anti-Corruption Coalition, had accused the Assembly of spending the amount to construct a gate. The group also sought investigation of the claim.

Speaking at plenary, Dr. Obasa said the allegation stemmed from the fear of some people over 2027 which is still more than two years away.

Obasa further debunked the claim that the House spent N200 million on its recently organised 22nd thanksgiving service for staff.

“It is so funny. How much is the allocation of the Assembly in the whole year that we will decide to spend N17 billion on a gate? They even claimed that we expended 200 million on thanksgiving that did not hold.

“We are aware that at a period like this when we are approaching elections in 2027, we should expect such things. I think some people are scared and I don’t know why.

“This House did not and has not embarked on any such project. We are not that reckless. We had our thanksgiving last Friday and dignitaries from various parts of the State attended it,” the Speaker said.

Addressing further claims by the group about the alleged relationship between him and the chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ola Olukoyede, the Speaker denied attending the latter’s screening and confirmation by the National Assembly.

“They said that I was at the National Assembly when they were confirming the EFCC chairman. I want to believe that there are CCTV cameras at the National Assembly to identify those who attended the event. The press must have written about it too. So the group should do more to confirm if I was there.

“This is just to deny the allegations in the interest of the public and not the writers because the writers are not those we should be joining words with,” the Speaker said.

Earlier, the House, through its spokesperson, Hon. Stephen Ogundipe, had addressed the allegations noting that the Assembly bases its activities on integrity, transparency and accountability.

“It is ludicrous the claim about constituency intervention funds and constituency project funds and their handling by Speaker Mudashiru Obasa and Clerk of the House, Barr. Olalekan Onafeko as claimed by the group.

“One would have expected a self-acclaimed anti-corruption crusading group to do its groundwork before jumping across the fence with conviction that it hit a jackpot to malign an institution of repute in the name of politics.

“Simply put, the Lagos State House of Assembly does not have any such funds. The Assembly does not embark on constituency projects. Instead, once every year, the House holds stakeholders’ meetings simultaneously across the state where constituents have the opportunity to tell the lawmakers their expectations and make requests for the betterment of the state.

“These requests and expectations are compiled and sent to the executive arm of government for consideration as inputs in subsequent budgets. If this is what the group takes as constituency intervention or project funds, we are sure this explanation has given the required education, moreover, it is common knowledge that it is the responsibility of the Executive arm to execute such projects,” the earlier statement by Ogundipe read.

Eromosele Ebhomele
Chief Press Secretary to the Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly.

Continue Reading

Politics

Banwo & Ighodalo Threaten Legal Action Against APC Chairman Over Defamatory Allegations

Published

on

Banwo & Ighodalo Threaten Legal Action Against APC Chairman Over Defamatory Allegations

Banwo & Ighodalo Threaten Legal Action Against APC Chairman Over Defamatory Allegations

Renowned Nigerian law firm Banwo & Ighodalo is preparing to take legal action against Jarrett Tenebe, Acting Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Edo State, over allegations described as defamatory and unfounded.

In a formal letter dated December 18, 2024, senior advocate Abimbola Akeredolu (SAN) accused Tenebe of making libelous claims against the firm’s founding partner, Mr. Asue Ighodalo. The allegations stem from a December 17 interview on TMC TV/Radio, during which Tenebe alleged that Mr. Ighodalo “stole 21 government vehicles” from the Edo State Government.

Despite a prior demand for an apology and retraction in a December 11 letter, Tenebe has reportedly failed to comply. Banwo & Ighodalo has now issued a three-day ultimatum for him to withdraw the statements or face formal legal proceedings.

In a related statement, the Team Asue Media Organisation (TAMO) categorically denied the accusations, labeling them a calculated smear campaign intended to discredit Mr. Ighodalo. The statement, signed by TAMO spokesperson Erhabor Emokpae, emphasized that Mr. Ighodalo has an unblemished record of public service. It further clarified that Alaghodaro, a private-sector-driven initiative chaired by Mr. Ighodalo, is committed to driving economic growth and investment in Edo State.

TAMO underscored Mr. Ighodalo’s integrity, noting that he has personally funded his expenses throughout his 16 years of public service, including his tenure as Chairman of Alaghodaro. The allegations of vehicle theft were described as baseless and absurd, with no evidence to substantiate them.

Banwo & Ighodalo has reiterated its commitment to pursuing all legal remedies should the defamatory statements not be retracted. The firm condemned the misuse of misinformation for political gain, warning that such actions undermine public trust and damage democratic institutions.

“We call on all parties to adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and decency in public discourse,” the firm stated.

Should Tenebe fail to meet the ultimatum, the case is expected to proceed to court, with further developments anticipated in the coming days.

 

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending