society
THE BANQUET OF BETRAYAL: HOW TINUBU TURNED DEMOCRACY INTO A DYNASTY OF DECEIT AND A NATION INTO A PRISON OF PAIN
THE BANQUET OF BETRAYAL: HOW TINUBU TURNED DEMOCRACY INTO A DYNASTY OF DECEIT AND A NATION INTO A PRISON OF PAIN.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com
“From the abolition of subsidy to the devaluation of the naira; a chronicle of promises broken, lives hollowed and institutions hollowed out.”
Nigeria entered the Tinubu era in 2023 with weary hope and brittle expectations. A man who campaigned on renewal and competence promised national rebirth; instead, two years in, many Nigerians find themselves marooned on an island of austerity while corridors of power host a banquet of betrayal. This is not mere rhetoric; it is an accounting of policy choices, institutional opacity and political signals that have combined to make democracy look like a dynasty and the state feel like a cage.
The signal moment (and the beginning of the banquet) came on 29 May 2023, when President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared, in his inaugural address, that “the fuel subsidy is gone.” The line was short, performative and definitive; its policy tail was long and brutal. Within days, pump prices tripled in many places and transport and food costs ballooned, hitting the poorest households first and hardest. The subsidy’s removal was not a private misstep or a technical tweak: it was a public re-ordering of the social contract, executed with scant preparation for the human cost.
Economic governance under Tinubu has been characterised by shock therapy over gradualism. The naira was allowed to tumble (a policy some outside experts applaud as necessary for competitiveness) but the domestic reality has been wrenching. Between late-2023 and 2025 Nigeria’s currency slumped dramatically, inflation soared into double digits that bite into family budgets and food insecurity rose. Think tanks and international institutions concede that reforms have improved macro indicators (reserves and a more rational foreign-exchange regime) but they have been blunt: these “gains have yet to benefit all Nigerians.” In short: the economy’s scoreboard improved for investors while the scoreboard for ordinary citizens registered collapse.
Make no mistake: policy changes that correct long-standing distortions are defensible in theory. The political choice is what separates responsible reformers from rulers who rule by decree. Reforms must be sequenced, cushioned and accompanied by transparent social protections. Instead, the Tinubu administration has pursued hard-edged measures (subsidy removal, a unified exchange rate, monetary tightening) with insufficient buffers for the poor, weak social safety nets and an administrative state that oftentimes appears reactive rather than humane. The result is a country where macro stability is invoked as an argument for the very hardship that is tearing apart households and livelihoods.
Political legitimacy is the currency of democracy. Where did it go? First, by concentrating economic decisions in a narrow circle and by elevating elites to roles that feel like patronage rather than public service, the administration has fed a sense of exclusion. Second, the opacity around critical issues (from public contracts to foreign engagements) has made accountability a performative drama rather than a civic instrument. Third, when serious allegations linger (including the prolonged saga in which U.S. agencies were ordered by a court to release records related to past investigations) the Presidency’s responses have been defensive and to many citizens, evasive. The American court rulings and filings are not gossip; they are court documents and reputable reporting. Those controversies erode trust and feed the narrative that power has developed immunity to scrutiny.
The human price is measurable. The IMF and other multilateral institutions have repeatedly warned that while reform has stabilised some macro variables, poverty and food insecurity remain painfully high. Recent IMF reporting estimated that poverty continues to afflict a huge share of Nigerians and cautioned that “gains have yet to benefit all Nigerians.” In practice, this means more families skipping meals, more children out of school and more skilled workers looking outward for escape. Democracy, when it no longer delivers basic livelihoods, becomes a hollow ritual.
Yet the language of “reform” has served convenient political ends. It has been wielded as a shield for tellingly concentrated appointments, for reshuffles that redistribute influence rather than lift capacity, and for a style of governing that prizes headline sovereign-debt wins and investor feel-good stories while everyday Nigerians drown in the rising cost of living. Sahara, Reuters, AP and other outlets documented the government’s managerial re-organs (a new economic council and emergency taskforces) but also recorded the public anger: strikes, protests and palpable frustration that has occasionally spilled into violence and arrests. Governance cannot be judged only by bond markets; it must be judged by how it protects the vulnerable.
If we are to name the disease, let us call it what it is: a politics of elite consolidation that borrows the language of reform but advances the interests of the few. The dynasty is not a royal family by blood, but a recurring pattern; a revolving door in which political survival is secured by alliances with moneyed interests and by the manufacture of consent via technocratic rhetoric. Meanwhile, ordinary citizens condition their lives on unpredictable policy swings: the sudden removal of subsidies, abrupt currency realignments and fiscal choices that transfer risk from the state to households. The “banquet” is thus two tables: one for the elites who dine on patronage and gates to capital and another for the mass of the people who pay the bill.
What must Nigerians and their friends around the world demand? First, transparency: publish procurement details, fiscal retentions and revenue accounts in machine-readable form. Second, social cushioning: targeted cash transfers, food programmes and a durable plan to tackle the immediate pain of inflation. Third, genuine institutional reform: strengthen anti-corruption institutions, fortify the judiciary’s independence and ensure electoral bodies are beyond partisan capture. Fourth, open dialogue: a government that truly consults broad civic actors will reduce the temptation to govern by executive fiat.
It is still possible to repair the damage to turn reforms into broad-based recovery rather than elite enrichment. The IMF and leading policy institutes have signalled the route: pair macro stabilisation with social protection; raise revenues equitably rather than squeeze the poor and rebuild trust through accountability. If these steps are not taken, the dynasty will calcify and the prison of pain will become permanent.
In the end, the choice is stark and moral. Democracy cannot survive as a brand for the few; it must be a shared project. The banquet of betrayal must end. Else we will have traded a republic for a regime that calls itself a government and anoint a dynasty that calls itself reform. Nigerians deserve better and history will not forget who served the people and who served only themselves.
Alleged Manipulation of Defilement Case Sparks Call for Review of Legal Advice in Lagos
By Ifeoma Ikem
A legal controversy has emerged in Lagos following a petition seeking a review of a legal advice issued in a case involving two female teachers accused of negligence in a child injury incident at a nursery school in Ikorodu.
The petition, submitted by Crown Cannan Attorneys, urges the Lagos State Ministry of Justice to reconsider the legal advice issued on September 16, 2022, in the case titled Commissioner of Police vs. Ambassador Rukayat Tobiloba and Rukayat Lawal.
Addressed to the former Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Moyosore Onigbanjo, the application argues that the legal advice may have been influenced by what the petition describes as a “deliberate manipulation of facts.”
According to counsel representing the defendants, the allegations stem from an incident that allegedly occurred on October 26, 2021, at Great Kezino Nursery and Primary School located in the Adamo area of Ikorodu, Lagos.
The defendants, Ambassador Rukayat Tobiloba, 26, and Rukayat Lawal, 24, were reportedly the class teacher and assistant class teacher respectively in charge of a Nursery One class where the incident occurred.
Court documents indicate that a three-year-old pupil, identified as Victim A, was reportedly injured after another pupil allegedly pierced a pencil into her private part during school hours.
The prosecution claims the incident occurred due to the failure of the teachers to exercise adequate care and supervision over the children under their custody.
Based on this allegation, the two educators were charged with negligence under Section 252 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015, which addresses acts that may cause harm through lack of proper care.
The defendants were subsequently arraigned before Magistrate Court No. 2 in Ikeja on April 19, 2022, where they faced a one-count charge relating to the incident.
During the investigation conducted at the Gender Unit of the Lagos State Police Command in Ikeja, several civil society groups reportedly monitored the proceedings.
Among them were representatives of the African Women Lawyers Association (AWLA) and other non-governmental organizations.
These groups reportedly raised concerns about what they described as a growing tendency to weaponise allegations of child abuse in ways that could unfairly damage reputations and careers.
In its petition, the defence team argued that the case deserves a fresh review to ensure that justice is served based on verified facts rather than assumptions or public pressure.
They urged the Ministry of Justice to carefully reassess the legal advice and the circumstances surrounding the investigation to determine whether the prosecution should proceed as currently framed.
Legal observers say the outcome of the requested review could determine the next stage of the case and may also highlight broader concerns about investigative procedures and child protection cases within the justice system.
Reacting to a viral social media post by Ambassador Rukayat Tobiloba, who claimed she might be jailed for defilement, the head teacher of Great Kezino Nursery and Primary School, Mrs. Edaolaropin Toyin, provided the school’s account of events.
According to her, the pupil identified as Victim A was enrolled in the Nursery One class on September 20, 2021, which had about 15 pupils.
She explained that on October 26, 2021, the pupil was transported home on the school bus after closing hours and handed over to her father around 4:30 p.m.
“Later that night, the pupil’s mother allegedly contacted the head teacher, claiming her daughter cried while bathing and alleged that a male classmate, Victim B, had inserted a pencil into her private part during school hours,” she said.
The school, however, rejected the allegation, maintaining that no such incident occurred while the child was in its custody.
“The following morning, the teacher visited the pupil’s home, where the father reportedly denied the mother’s account of the incident,” Toyin added.
She said the situation escalated later that day when the child’s parents arrived at the school with police officers from Imota Police Station demanding that the alleged male classmate be produced.
The head teacher further stated that the school management had supported Tobiloba throughout the legal process.
“Since the incident happened, the school management has never stopped supporting Tobiloba’s welfare until last year when she sent a WhatsApp message saying she was no longer interested in the court matter, claiming she had relocated to Ibadan,” she said.
She described the claims currently circulating on social media as “defamatory narratives.”
*GEN CG MUSA SUPPORT INITIATIVE MOURNS FALLEN HEROES AND URGES UNITY IN SECURITY SUPPORT
The Gen Christopher Gwabin Musa Support Initiative (GCGMSI) expresses its heartfelt condolences to His Excellency Gen Christopher Gwabin Musa OFR, Minister of Defence of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Grand Patron of the Initiative, and the families of the fallen heroes who courageously lost their lives in a recent attack by ISWAP in Konduga, Marte, Jakana, and Dalori in Borno State, northeast Nigeria. Among the tragic losses were three senior military commanders: Major U.I. Mairiga, Lt-Col Umar Faruq, and Lt-Col S.I. Iliyasu, who dedicated their lives to the service of our nation.
The GCGMSI implores the public to continue supporting our security agencies, emphasizing that the safety and security of our nation is a collective responsibility. Every day, our security forces pay the ultimate price to safeguard our country. We urge the public to remain supportive, pray for their success, and refrain from politicizing the security challenges we face.
This was contained in a statement signed by the Convener, Ibrahim Dahiru Danfulani Sadaukin Garkuwan Keffi/Betara Biu, which has been made available to the press. The statement highlights the initiative’s profound concern for the losses sustained by our security personnel and reflects on the broader security situation in Nigeria.
In his unwavering commitment to addressing the insecurity plaguing our nation, the Minister of Defence, Gen Christopher Gwabin Musa, has consistently engaged in urgent meetings with service chiefs, reinforcing strategic plans to combat threats and enhance national security. His leadership and decisive actions demonstrate a dedication to restoring peace and stability across our regions, ensuring a safer environment for all Nigerians.
society
SECURITY IS A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY: BACKING OUR MINISTER OF DEFENCE GEN. CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA OFR
SECURITY IS A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY: BACKING OUR MINISTER OF DEFENCE GEN. CHRISTOPHER GWABIN MUSA OFR
By Ibrahim Dahiru Danfulani
In these challenging times, it is essential for all Nigerians to rally behind our leaders, particularly His Excellency Gen. Christopher Gwabin Musa OFR, the Minister of Defence. The security of our nation is not a matter to be taken lightly or politicized. Gen. Musa, recognized for his unwavering dedication and sacrifice, has served our country commendably throughout his life.
Following the recent reshuffle of service chiefs by President Asiwaju Bola Ahamed Tinubu GCFR, which resulted in Gen. Musa’s retirement as Chief of Defence Staff, many voiced their concerns. Yet, upon his appointment as Minister of Defence, there was a renewed sense of hope among the populace. Gen. Musa has embraced his role with an unwavering commitment, often sacrificing his rest to ensure the safety and security of our great nation.
While it is undeniable that Nigeria faces security challenges, we must approach these issues with unity rather than division. It is crucial to recognize that those who politicize our national security are often those who have not contributed positively to the success of our security agencies. Instead of spreading negativity, we should support Gen. Musa in his mission to restore peace and stability.
To achieve our collective goal of a secure Nigeria, we must provide Gen. Musa with the trust he deserves. His vision and determination, paired with our support and prayers, can pave the way to overcoming the challenges we face. It’s time for every Nigerian to put aside political differences and work together for the common good. Let us have faith in our leaders and trust in Gen. Musa’s ability to steer our nation towards safety and security.
-
society6 months agoReligion: Africa’s Oldest Weapon of Enslavement and the Forgotten Truth
-
news3 months agoWHO REALLY OWNS MONIEPOINT? The $290 Million Deal That Sold Nigeria’s Top Fintech to Foreign Interests
-
Business6 months agoGTCO increases GTBank’s Paid-Up Capital to ₦504 Billion
-
society6 months ago“You Are Never Without Help” – Pastor Gebhardt Berndt Inspires Hope Through Empower Church (Video)