society
The Severe Consequences of Speaking Against an Altar of God: A Case Study of Grace Nation
The Severe Consequences of Speaking Against an Altar of God:
A Case Study of Grace Nation
By Sunday Adeyemi
Altars can best be described as sacred meeting points where the spiritual intersects with the physical—a place where destinies are shaped and outcomes determined.
Many schools of thought believe that nothing manifests in the physical realm without first being concluded in the spiritual. For this reason, speaking against an altar is considered extremely dangerous, as altars play a decisive role in determining both positive and negative outcomes in human affairs.
This analysis examines the good, the bad, and the ugly consequences associated with speaking against an altar, using the Grace Nation altar as a case study.
The Good: The Power of an Altar
An altar is a powerful spiritual platform where divine transactions take place. It is a place of supernatural intervention, transformation, and restoration. When approached with clean hands, pure intentions, and genuine faith, an altar has the capacity to change narratives—turning negative situations into testimonies.
Commitment and service to an altar speak on behalf of the worshipper. When individuals consistently honour an altar by offering what it requires and approaching it with sincerity, the same altar responds swiftly with favour, breakthroughs, and divine alignment.
Using the Grace Nation altar as an example, numerous testimonies confirm that it has brought remarkable blessings into the lives of its citizens. Many have experienced positive transformations in long-standing life patterns.
There are documented testimonies of individuals who trusted God through the Grace Nation International (Liberation City) altar and received the fruit of the womb after years of waiting. Others testify to supernatural breakthroughs in foreign opportunities, marital settlements for singles, and unexpected divine benefits.
Further findings indicate that under the leadership of the Set Man, Dr. Chris Okafor, the Grace Nation altar has rewritten negative family patterns, dismantled generational barriers to inheritance, and restored lost glory in many families.
The strength of an altar lies in its ability to examine, scrutinize, and resolve cases presented before it with sincerity and faith. However, altars must never be taken for granted, as they are not only powerful for good but can be severe when dishonoured.
The Bad: The Danger of Speaking Against an Altar
The negative consequences of speaking against an altar are profound and far-reaching. Speaking evil against an altar of God exposes an individual to spiritual vulnerability. The spiritual covering provided by that altar is lifted, leaving the person open to attacks and afflictions.
In such cases, the altar begins to work against the individual and, in some instances, against their generations. Opportunities become blocked, progress is hindered, and efforts are repeatedly frustrated.
In spiritual terms, altars are believed to deploy angels on assignment. For those who speak against an altar, these same spiritual forces are said to oppose their endeavours, blocking blessings and causing persistent setbacks. Nothing appears to work in their favour, and life becomes characterised by struggle and disappointment.
The Ugly: The Ultimate Consequence
Altars are generally categorised into two types: good altars and evil altars. Regardless of the category, speaking against an altar carries grave consequences. The ultimate repercussion, according to spiritual belief, is that an altar can send spiritual agents on assignment to execute judgment against those who dishonour it or the servant who tends it.

This represents the most severe outcome—where consequences escalate beyond correction and into irreversible loss. It is believed that once an altar is provoked through malicious speech or actions, the backlash is unavoidable.
Final Thoughts
It is important to state clearly and without reservation that speaking against any altar—whether perceived as good or bad—invites spiritual repercussions. Whatever is spoken against an altar is believed to rebound upon the speaker. No one speaks against an altar and goes unscathed.
Scripture teaches that the only sin without forgiveness is speaking against the Holy Spirit—often regarded as the ultimate altar of God. Therefore, wisdom, restraint, and reverence are essential when dealing with spiritual matters.
Sunday Adeyemi is a Lagos-based journalist, society writer, and editor with Society Herald Magazine and Online.
society
Nwobi Political Dynasty Pays Condolence Visit to Udeogu Family in Awgu
Nwobi Political Dynasty Pays Condolence Visit to Udeogu Family in Awgu.
By George O. Sylvester
In a powerful demonstration of empathy, unity, and responsible leadership, the Nwobi Political Dynasty, led by eminent industrialist, philanthropist, and political leader, High Chief Francis Osy Nwobi, CEO and Managing Director of Fontana Group of Companies, has paid a condolence visit to the family of Late Mrs. Maria Ihunanya Nwigwe Udeogu of Mgbowo, Awgu Local Government Area of Enugu State.
The visit, which took place in an atmosphere of solemn reflection and communal solidarity, was aimed at commiserating with the bereaved family and standing with them during one of the most difficult moments in human existence amid the loss of a loved one. The late Mrs. Udeogu was remembered as a devoted mother, community pillar and woman of dignity whose life left an indelible mark on her family and the wider Mgbowo community.
Speaking during the visit, High Chief Francis Osy Nwobi expressed deep sorrow over the passing of Mrs. Udeogu, describing her death as a significant loss not only to her immediate family but also to the entire Awgu axis. He noted that death, though inevitable, always leaves behind pain and emptiness, especially when it takes individuals whose lives were defined by kindness, resilience and service to others.
High Chief Nwobi urged the family to draw strength from the worthy legacy the deceased left behind, stressing that a fulfilled life is not measured by length of years alone, but by the positive impact made on people and society. He offered prayers for the peaceful repose of the soul of Mrs. Udeogu and asked God Almighty to grant the family the grace, strength and comfort needed to bear the irreparable loss.
The condolence visit was further dignified by the presence of a distinguished entourage, reflecting the depth of respect and solidarity extended by the Nwobi Political Dynasty. Among those present were Chief Gilbert Destiny Onuoha, CEO/Managing Director of Blessed Destiny Energy Ltd; Prince Smart I. Nwobi, CEO Smart (N) Attorney’s INC & the President of the Nigeria Union South Africa (NUSA); Hon. Friday Okolie, former Senior Special Assistant to the Governor; Engr. Simon Igwe, CEO of Bling Furniture and His Royal Highness, Igwe Dr. Godwin Okosisi Nwobi, Ugwundu II of Ugwuleshi Awgu, alongside other notable leaders, professionals and stakeholders.
Their collective presence was widely seen as a strong statement of unity across political, traditional, businessand diaspora leadership structures, underscoring the importance of shared humanity and communal responsibility beyond partisan or economic interests.
Observers noted that the condolence visit aligns with the long-standing tradition of the Nwobi Political Dynasty in promoting people-centered leadership, community cohesion and moral responsibility. Over the years, the dynasty has earned respect across Enugu State and beyond for consistently identifying with grassroots communities during moments of joy and sorrow alike.
For the people of Mgbowo and Awgu at large, the visit served as a reminder that true leadership is not only demonstrated during times of political campaigns or economic prosperity, but also in moments of grief, when compassion, presence and genuine concern matter most.
Members of the Udeogu family, visibly moved by the show of love and solidarity, expressed profound gratitude to High Chief Nwobi and his delegation. They described the visit as deeply comforting and reassuring, noting that such gestures strengthen communal bonds and help families navigate the emotional weight of bereavement.
They further prayed for God’s continued guidance and strength upon the Nwobi Political Dynasty, acknowledging the delegation’s prayers, kind words and moral support as a testament to enduring friendship and leadership rooted in humanity.
As the family prepares to bid their final farewell to Mrs. Maria Ihunanya Nwigwe Udeogu, many in the community continue to celebrate her life, values, and contributions. Her legacy, they say, will live on through the lives she touched and the principles she embodied.
The condolence visit once again reinforces the belief that compassion remains one of the strongest pillars of leadership and community development with an ideal the Nwobi Political Dynasty continues to uphold with consistency and dignity.
society
WALE MURAINA EXPANDS HIS REACH WITH UK FILM COLLABORATION
WALE MURAINA EXPANDS HIS REACH WITH UK FILM COLLABORATION
Nigerian film producer Wale Muraina is taking a major step onto the international stage through a collaboration with Edinburgh-based Omilan Productions Ltd on the upcoming feature film Between Us, set to begin principal photography in the United Kingdom.
Produced and directed by Oluyinka Omilani, the film features an international cast including Gemma Dawson (UK), Olarotim Fakunle (Nigeria), and Ian Bjorn (UK). For Wale Muraina, Between Us marks his first time producing a fully UK-set film, following his earlier collaboration with Omilan Productions on Eegunleti, which was shot in both Nigeria and the UK. In addition to producing, Muraina also shares writer’s credit as co-writer of the film, marking an expanded creative role in the project.Muraina notes key differences between Nigerian and UK film production, particularly the UK’s structured approach to crew roles, budgeting, and union-regulated workflows. He describes the experience as valuable exposure to large-scale coordination and international production standards.
Beyond the project itself, Muraina emphasizes the importance of strong distribution networks in ensuring African stories reach global audiences. He believes international collaborations not only open doors for African producers but also provide crucial insight into how films are packaged and positioned for worldwide distribution.As Between Us moves into production, Muraina sees the film as an important milestone in his career and a step toward greater global visibility for African talent and storytelling.
society
Nigeria’s $9 Million Image-Laundering Debacle: Misplaced Priorities, Diplomatic Failure and the Cost of Reputation Over Security
Nigeria’s $9 Million Image-Laundering Debacle: Misplaced Priorities, Diplomatic Failure and the Cost of Reputation Over Security.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester
“Why Abuja’s Decision to Spend Millions on U.S. Lobbying Amid Deepening Insecurity and Economic Hardship Is a National Embarrassment.”
In a decision that has sparked domestic outrage and intensified global scrutiny, the Federal Government of Nigeria has entered into a $9 million (about ₦13.5 billion) lobbying contract with a Washington-based public affairs firm in a bid to shape the narrative over alleged “GENOCIDE” claims against Christians in the country. The contract, which was executed on December 17, 2025, was signed on behalf of the Nigerian government by Aster Legal, a Kaduna-based law firm and DCI Group, an American lobbying and public affairs company. The agreement mandates that DCI Group help communicate Nigeria’s actions to protect Christian communities and sustain U.S. support for counter-terrorism efforts.
Yet, this costly engagement abroad has provoked resounding condemnation from political parties, civil society organizations and policy analysts who argue that such an expenditure (at a time of worsening insecurity and economic hardship) reflects a distorted sense of national priority and diplomatic failure.
A $9 Million Contract Amid Crises at Home. Under the terms of the contract, Nigeria paid an upfront $4.5 million on December 12, 2025, covering the first six months of the lobbying engagement. The remaining amount is structured as a monthly retainer of $750,000, bringing the total value to $9 million over one year, with the initial period running until June 30, 2026, and subject to automatic renewal unless terminated by either party with a 60-day notice.
The ostensible objective, officials say, is to “assist the Nigerian government in communicating its actions to protect Nigerian Christian communities and maintaining U.S. support in countering West African jihadist groups and other destabilizing elements.”
On its face, this may seem like a legitimate diplomatic engagement. However, critics argue it is reductive, counterproductive and a glaring misallocation of public funds at a time when Nigerians are confronted with everyday threats and from rampant banditry and terrorism to crippling inflation and infrastructure decay.
Misplaced Priorities, According to Critics. Commentators and civil society leaders have condemned the contract as scandalous, indefensible and morally blind. The African Democratic Congress (ADC), for instance, described the expenditure as “OBSCENE,” saying no amount of paid lobbying would hide the government’s failure to protect lives and property at home. The party’s National Publicity Secretary said: “While the ADC recognizes the importance of representing Nigeria’s interests internationally, spending $9 million on image management at a time when millions of Nigerians cannot afford food, fuel, or basic healthcare is a clear case of misplaced priorities and moral blindness.”
Similarly, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) labeled the public relations contract “DEFECTIVE and DECEPTIVE,” questioning why a government with vacant ambassadorial positions would outsource core diplomatic functions to a private law firm and yet fail to articulate its record effectively through its own diplomatic corps.
Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) also weighed in, calling the move a “senseless waste of public funds” when those resources could have been deployed to address security gaps that have cost thousands of lives and displaced millions.
Diplomacy by Proxy: A Sign of Institutional Weakness?

The Nigerian government’s turn to paid lobbying in Washington exposes a deeper institutional weakness in Nigeria’s diplomatic architecture. Diplomats and foreign service professionals are meant to champion Nigeria’s interests abroad. Yet, the reliance on external firms suggests that the government views international image management as a technical exercise to be contracted rather than a fundamental part of statecraft to be pursued through capable, accountable institutions.
An experienced former foreign service officer, speaking anonymously, noted: “A government that has left key ambassadorial positions vacant now seeks to outsource diplomacy to lobbyists, further weakening Nigeria’s institutional credibility and reducing foreign policy to transactional propaganda.” This view echoes widespread concern that international perception cannot be effectively rebranded without genuine improvement in security and governance on the ground.
The Genocide Narrative and Its Complexity. The backdrop to this lobbying contract is a contentious narrative surrounding alleged violence against Christian communities in Nigeria. In 2025, influential U.S. political figures, including former President Donald Trump, characterized the violence as “GENOCIDE,” a designation the Nigerian government has firmly rejected. Nigerian authorities insist that insecurity affects all communities irrespective of religion, attributing violence to terrorism, banditry and criminality rather than systematic religious persecution.
Yet the issue has gained traction among foreign policymakers, think tanks and diaspora advocates who argue that ethno-religious violence in Nigeria is intensifying and requires urgent international attention. This has created a competitive narrative environment in Washington, with various lobbyists, including groups linked to pro-Biafra activism, vying to influence U.S. policy and perceptions. According to recent reporting, Nigeria may well be outspending these lobbyists in an effort to shape the narrative in its favour.
While the debate is complex and multifaceted, the government’s heavy investment in narrative management abroad raises a fundamental question: Why spend millions on perception management when realities on the ground cry out for sound governance and security solutions?
A Government Under Pressure. Nigeria’s diplomatic outreach comes at a time when its international standing is under pressure. Aside from allegations of targeted violence, the country grapples with allegations of human rights violations in various regions and concern over the effectiveness of its counter-terrorism strategies. Meanwhile, within Nigeria, citizens face deteriorating economic conditions, skyrocketing inflation and daily insecurity.
A respected international relations scholar, Professor Amina Yusuf, summed up the dilemma: “Reputation is a by-product of reality, not a substitute for it. A government cannot buy legitimacy abroad while legitimacy at home collapses.”
This insight is particularly poignant in a nation where tertiary education experts and economists have repeatedly argued that security and economic stability are prerequisites for a positive global image and not the other way around. Investing in robust public institutions and ensuring citizens’ safety should logically precede investment in public relations abroad.
Toward an Authentic National Narrative. If Nigeria is to defend its global image effectively, the starting point must be substantive improvements at home. International audiences (policymakers, investors and civil society) look beyond glossy talking points to concrete developments: declining rates of violence, improved access to justice, respect for human rights and economic progress.
A veteran diplomatic analyst, Ambassador (ret.) Chukwuemeka Okafor, stresses this point: “Diplomacy without results is propaganda, and propaganda without results is hypocrisy. Our ambassadors must be empowered to tell our story, grounded in progress, not spin.”
The current approach (outsourcing narrative management while core domestic issues fester) runs the risk of projecting desperation rather than confidence. It is akin to repainting a crumbling wall instead of repairing the foundation.
Summative Perspective: Rebuilding Trust Through Action. Nigeria’s $9 million image management deal with a U.S. lobbying firm lays bare a deeper crisis of governance. It exemplifies a decisions-over-delivery mindset, prioritizing perception over performance. At a time when millions of Nigerians face insecurity, economic hardship and eroding trust in state institutions, this contract underscores a leadership disconnected from the immediate needs of its people.
A government that truly cares about its global reputation must first ensure security, accountability and prosperity at home. Only then can international narratives shift, but not through paid lobbyists but through undeniable progress. As Professor Yusuf aptly concludes: “A nation’s reputation is earned in the field, not bought in the boardroom.”
This report was compiled with reference to multiple sources including Nigeria’s recent $9 million lobbying engagement to counter alleged genocide claims and critical analyses of the broader political responses.
-
celebrity radar - gossips5 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society5 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
Business5 months agoBatsumi Travel CEO Lisa Sebogodi Wins Prestigious Africa Travel 100 Women Award
-
news5 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING










