Connect with us

society

Tinubu’s Greatest Failure: Insecurity Has Made Nigeria a Killing Field

Published

on

Tinubu’s Greatest Failure: Insecurity Has Made Nigeria a Killing Field.

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com

In a nation where blood flows more freely than clean water and the average citizen sleeps with one eye open, the conversation about Nigeria’s survival has shifted from economic growth and job creation to the fundamental right to life. Security is not just a policy issue; it is the very foundation of governance. Sadly, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has utterly failed in this most sacred duty.

There is no peace in the Northeast. There is no safety in the Northwest. Blood flows in the North-Central. The South-South is bleeding from oil theft and continous violence. The Southeast is under siege from unknown gunmen and militarization. The Southwest (Tinubu’s own region) isn’t exempt either with kidnapping and violent crimes now part of daily life. Who exactly is safe in Nigeria today?

Let’s be clear: nothing is more important than the protection of lives and properties. Even the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) is clear in Section 14(2)(b): “The security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government.” If the government cannot protect its people, then that government has failed. And President Tinubu, despite his flowing agbada and grand political image as “Jagaban,” has failed woefully.

“Na Who Dey Alive Dey Chop”
A popular Nigerian phrase that captures this sentiment is: “Na who dey alive dey chop.” You can’t talk about inflation, minimum wage, education or infrastructure when you’re constantly looking over your shoulder, wondering if you’ll be the next victim of kidnapping or mass murder. Insecurity has destroyed markets, closed schools and emptied farmlands. Farmers in Zamfara, Borno, Plateau and Benue can no longer go to their farms. The roads between Kaduna and Abuja are death traps. The forests from Ondo to Enugu are controlled by bandits. Nowhere is safe.

How can a government that cannot protect lives talk about attracting foreign investment? What investor would risk their capital in a country where entire communities are wiped out overnight? And yet, this administration keeps spinning illusions about economic recovery while citizens are slaughtered like animals.

Defenders of the Indefensible
Some political loyalists and sycophants continue to defend Tinubu using logic that insults common sense. They tell us to be patient. They say insecurity didn’t start with Tinubu, but did he not campaign with the promise to restore security? Did he not swear to protect every Nigerian? If you inherit a house on fire, you don’t fan the flames, you put it out! Two years into his presidency, we’re still hearing excuses while mass graves multiply across the country.

Defending Tinubu’s inaction using history or regional politics is dangerous and dishonest. If the Taliban were to attack Nigeria tomorrow and the Tinubu government allows them to slaughter Nigerians without resistance, will we again blame religion or foreign influence or will we hold the Commander-in-Chief accountable?

This is not a religious issue. It is not an ethnic problem. It is a question of leadership. And in this critical area, Tinubu has failed to lead, failed to inspire and most importantly, failed to protect.

Grim Facts Don’t Lie
Let’s look at the numbers. According to SBM Intelligence, over 4,556 Nigerians were killed and more than 3,000 abducted in 2023 alone; Tinubu’s first year in office. Amnesty International reported that in Kaduna, Plateau and Benue states, coordinated attacks on villages continue with little or no military intervention. In March 2024, over 300 people were killed in Plateau within a week. And yet, no national day of mourning was declared. No military heads were sacked. Life went on as if Nigerian lives meant nothing.

Security spending under Tinubu has skyrocketed with over ₦3.25 trillion allocated to defense and security in the 2024 budget, yet the insecurity situation has only worsened. Where is the money going? Why are our soldiers underpaid, under-equipped and overstretched? Why are bandits better armed than the police? Why are communities forming vigilante groups to do the job the government is paid to do?
“It is better to have no government than to have one that kills its own people through negligence.” ~ Femi Falana, SAN

No Excuses, Just Accountability
Leadership is not about sharing palliatives or jetting around the world for photo ops. It is about responsibility. Nigeria is not a playground for political experiments. It is a nation of over 200 million human lives. Tinubu should not be spending more time in Paris and London than in Borno, Zamfara or Benue.

In April 2025, President Tinubu boasted during a foreign investment summit that “Nigeria is open for business.” But the truth on the ground is grim. Foreign companies are shutting down due to insecurity. Telecom masts are being destroyed. Railway lines are vandalized. Schools in the North are closing en masse. Between 2020 and 2024, over 1,500 schoolchildren were abducted by terrorists and under Tinubu, not much has changed.

In the words of former Chief of Defence Staff, General Martin Luther Agwai (rtd): “The country is gradually being taken over by non-state actors while the state folds its arms.”

Citizens Are Losing Hope
Youths are tired. Families are broken. Dreams are buried alongside loved ones in shallow graves. The idea of Nigeria has become a nightmare for too many. From the herdsmen killings in Benue to the communal clashes in Taraba, the terrorist ambushes in Borno to the kidnapping rings in Ekiti, the story is the same: death, destruction and despair.

Even the National Assembly is grumbling. In May 2025, several lawmakers demanded the sack of National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu and the Service Chiefs, citing failure to tackle escalating insecurity. Yet Tinubu continues to operate in denial, unwilling to admit the rot, unable to inspire confidence.

What Should Tinubu Do?
Enough is enough. President Tinubu must:

Declare a state of emergency on national security; with clear military, intelligence and community policing strategies.

Restructure the Nigerian Police Force to function more autonomously, with proper funding, training and accountability.

Replace non-performing security chiefs, this is not a retirement home.

Engage local communities through civil-military cooperation, dialogue and intelligence sharing.

Publicly address Nigerians every month with real updates on security and not empty rhetoric.

Final Word
To those still defending Tinubu blindly: you are part of the problem. Patriotism does not mean defending failure. It means holding leaders accountable. Nigeria cannot move forward when her citizens are being buried in mass graves while politicians exchange blames and play ethnic cards.

Security is not an optional promise. It is a constitutional obligation. And President Tinubu, so far, has failed to meet that obligation. If nothing changes, history will remember him not as the reformer he claimed to be, but as the man who fiddled while Nigeria burned.

“A nation that cannot protect its citizens has signed its own death warrant.” ~ Prof. Chidi Odinkalu, human rights activist

Nigeria DESERVES better. Nigerians DEMAND better… And we must not rest until we get it.

Tinubu’s Greatest Failure: Insecurity Has Made Nigeria a Killing Field.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com

Written by George Omagbemi Sylvester
Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com

society

China’s Mosquito‑Sized Microdrone Ushers in a New Era of Covert Surveillance

Published

on

China’s Mosquito‑Sized Microdrone Ushers in a New Era of Covert Surveillance

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG

China’s National University of Defence Technology (NUDT) has developed a mosquito‑sized microdrone designed for covert surveillance and reconnaissance operations, revealing the prototype in June 2025 during a broadcast on China’s military channel CCTV‑7. The insect‑inspired device, measuring roughly 2 cm long and weighing about 0.3 grams, mimics living insect flight with two tiny flapping wings and hair‑thin legs, making it hard to detect by conventional systems.

Unveiled in Hunan Province, central China, the project leverages cutting‑edge micro‑electronics, bionic engineering, and lightweight materials to push the limits of micro aerial vehicle (MAV) technology. According to NUDT student Liang Hexiang, miniature platforms such as this one are “especially suited to information reconnaissance and special missions on the battlefield,” suggesting military applications where larger drones are impractical.

China’s push into micro‑robotics reflects a broader global trend, but the leap toward devices that resemble real insects raises intense debate. Proponents highlight the possibilities for close‑quarters intelligence gathering, urban reconnaissance, and operations in confined or denied spaces where typical UAVs cannot penetrate. Meanwhile, experts caution that limited power, short flight duration, and minimal payload capacity currently constrain real‑world performance, meaning these prototypes remain largely experimental.

Beyond military prospects, the innovation underscores China’s strategic focus on unmanned systems and AI‑integrated platforms, positioning it alongside other nations racing to explore next‑generation surveillance robotics. However, as the technology advances, concerns about privacy, ethical use, and potential misuse are intensifying, prompting calls for clear regulatory frameworks to govern ultra‑small drones that could blend unnoticed into civilian environments.

The mosquito‑sized microdrone thus symbolises both technological ambition and the complex challenges of balancing innovation with security and civil liberties in an era of shrinking machines with expanding capabilities.

Continue Reading

society

Banwo Questions Omokri’s Conduct After Appointment As Ambassador

Published

on

Banwo Questions Omokri’s Conduct After Appointment As Ambassador

 

Political commentator and founder of the Naija Lives Matter Organisation (NLM), Dr. Ope Banwo, has raised concerns about the conduct expected of diplomats following the appointment of Reno Omokri as Nigeria’s ambassador to Mexico.

 

In an article published on his website, www.mayoroffadeyi.com, Banwo argued that individuals appointed to represent Nigeria abroad are expected to maintain a level of neutrality and decorum that reflects the country’s diplomatic traditions.

 

The article titled “The Strange Case of Reno Omokri,” questions whether the tone of public political engagement associated with Omokri’s social media presence aligns with the expectations of diplomatic service.

 

Omokri, a former presidential aide who has built a strong online following through commentary on Nigerian politics and governance, was recently appointed as Nigeria’s envoy to Mexico.

 

According to Banwo’s article, the role of an ambassador requires a transition from partisan political commentary to broader national representation.

 

“An ambassador represents the entire nation and not a political party,” Banwo wrote, noting that diplomats are traditionally expected to avoid public political confrontations that could affect international perceptions of their countries.

 

He contrasted the roles of political campaigners and diplomats, arguing that the two require different communication styles and responsibilities.

 

“Politics is combative while diplomacy is measured,” Banwo stated in the article, emphasizing that ambassadors typically engage in dialogue, negotiation and relationship-building rather than domestic political disputes.

 

Banwo also pointed to the historical composition of Nigeria’s diplomatic corps, which has largely included career diplomats trained in international relations and protocol.

 

According to him, such professionals are accustomed to maintaining restraint in public communication because their statements can carry official implications.

 

The article also referenced the biblical book of Ecclesiastes to illustrate the author’s broader reflections on leadership and public office.

 

Banwo noted that the appointment of political figures to diplomatic positions is not unusual globally but stressed that such appointments usually come with expectations of behavioural adjustments.

 

He urged Nigerian public officials who hold diplomatic positions to prioritise the country’s international image and approach public commentary with caution.

 

“Nigeria deserves ambassadors who elevate the country’s image,” he wrote.

Continue Reading

society

How OPay Is Turning Product Architecture Into a Customer Service Advantage

Published

on

How OPay Is Turning Product Architecture Into a Customer Service Advantage

In high-volume fintech markets like Nigeria, customer service can no longer sit at the end of the business process. When a platform serves tens of millions of users and processes millions of transactions every day, the old model of customer service, call centres, long queues, and manual complaint handling quickly becomes too slow, too costly, and challenging to scale.

The future of customer service in fintech is not just about answering calls faster. It is about preventing problems before they happen. This is where product design, technology, and risk systems begin to play a bigger role. Instead of reacting to customer complaints, modern fintech platforms are now building customer protection and support directly into the app experience itself.

OPay is one of the platforms showing how this shift works in practice.

Over the past few years, OPay’s product development has followed a clear pattern. New features are not only designed to make payments easier, but also to reduce errors, prevent fraud, and lower the number of issues that customers need to complain about. In simple terms, many customer service problems are stopped before users even notice them.

One of the strongest examples of this approach is OPay’s real-time fraud and scam alerts. Traditionally, customers only contact support after money has already left their account. At that point, the damage is done, emotions are high, and recovery becomes more complex. OPay’s system works differently. When a transaction looks unusual, based on amount, timing, behaviour, or pattern, the system raises a warning before the transfer is completed. This gives users a chance to pause, review, and confirm. In many cases, this stops fraud before it happens.

For users, this feels like protection built into the app, not an emergency response after a loss. For the business, it means fewer fraud cases, fewer complaints, and less pressure on customer support teams. This proactive model aligns with global fintech best practices, which prioritise prevention over recovery.

Another important layer is step-up security for high-risk or high-value transactions. As users move more money and rely more heavily on digital wallets, security cannot be one-size-fits-all. Adding too many checks to every transaction creates frustration. Adding too few creates risk. OPay balances this by applying stronger security only when it is needed. For example, biometric verification and additional authentication steps are triggered in sensitive situations. This keeps everyday transactions smooth, while adding extra protection when the risk is higher. This approach builds trust quietly. Users may not always notice the security working in the background, but they feel the result: fewer unauthorised transfers and fewer urgent problems that require support intervention.

Beyond visible features, OPay also runs behaviour-based risk systems in the background. These systems monitor patterns such as sudden device changes, unusual login behaviour, or transaction activity that does not match a user’s normal habits. When something looks off, the system responds automatically. Most users never see these checks. But their impact shows up in fewer failed transactions, fewer reversals, and fewer cases where customers need to chase resolutions. As a result, customer service interactions shift away from crisis handling toward simple guidance and assistance.

Together, these layers form what can be called an invisible customer service system. Many issues are intercepted early, long before they become formal complaints. User sentiment on social media provides real-world signals of how this system is being experienced. On X (formerly Twitter), some users have publicly shared their experiences with OPay’s responsiveness and reliability.

One user, @ifedayo_johnson, wrote, “Opay has refunded it almost immediately. Before I even made this tweet but I didn’t notice. logged it as transfer made in error on the Opay app and they acted almost immediately. Commendable. Thank you @OPay_NG. I’m very impressed with this!”

Another user, @EgbonAduugbo, shared “The reason I love opay so much is that you hardly ever have to worry, wait or call their customer service for anything cuz everything just works!”

While social media comments are not formal performance metrics, they matter. They reflect how real users feel when systems work smoothly and issues are resolved quickly, often without friction. This product-led customer service model becomes even more important when viewed in the context of OPay’s scale. At this scale, even minor improvements in fraud prevention or transaction success rates can prevent thousands of potential complaints every day. In this context, customer service is no longer driven mainly by headcount. It is driven by engineering choices, risk models, and system design.

OPay’s journey suggests what the future of fintech in Africa may look like. The next generation of leaders will not only be those with the most users, but those whose systems are designed to protect users, resolve issues quickly, and reduce friction at scale.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending