Connect with us

Politics

INEC , DON’T PLUNGE NIGERIA INTO CHAOS

Published

on

INEC Cancels Election In Kogi

ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF ELECTION RESULTS: INEC , DON’T PLUNGE NIGERIA INTO CHAOS

INEC- The attention of the Centre for Social and Economic Rights (CSER) has been drawn to a statement credited to the National Commissioner for information and voter education, Independent National Electoral Commission INEC Mr. Festus Okoye in response to the National Assembly rejection of amendment of the Electoral Act to accommodate Electronic transmission of election results, where he reiterated the electoral umpire preparedness to deploy electronic transmission of results after having tested the process in remote areas during the 2020 Edo state gubernatorial election.

 

 

According to Okoye on a national television station as reported in a national daily, “ So we have made our own position very clear, that we have the capacity and we have the will to deepen the use of technology in the electoral process.”

INEC , DON’T PLUNGE NIGERIA INTO CHAOS

 

This statement by Mr. Festus Okoye as a representative of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is very unfortunate due to the fact that it has aided and abetted in politicizing a critical national discourse for which he has little or no knowledge technically and ought to have been circumspect and allowed the experts to educate him and Nigerians. To come out and hastily make a blanket statement on electronic transmission of election results nationwide in 36 states and the federal capital territory for future elections on the basis of transmission of results in remote areas in only Edo state in 2020 of which we are going to demand proof as the days go by, is rather unfortunate and depressing.

For a fact, if INEC is transmitting election results electronically, we know for sure that INEC as at this moment, despite the assertion of Mr. Okoye, does not have the technological system in place for election results in the whole of Nigeria, except if he can come out with verifiable facts to corroborate his claim and we hope he will come out to do that in the days ahead.

From the conversation around electronic transmission of election results at the National Assembly and in other fora, it has been established that the telecommunication coverage of the country by the GSM service providers according to the regulatory body Nigeria Communication Commision (NCC) is just about 50% and the coverage is not even equal, where some areas have 2G network, others have 3G and 4G network and the least that can provide a link for transmission of election results is a 3G network according to the experts.

As we speak, even the areas that  have 4G networks have a huge problem of telecommunication connectivity, which explains why even in urban areas like Lagos, Abuja, Ibadan, Onitsha, Aba, Kaduna, Kano etc. GSM users, organizations, government agencies, institutions and even Point of Sale (POS) terminal operators still contend with the issue of connectivity. For example, it’s a fact that there is virtually no Nigerian who has not had the traumatic experience of poor or zero network resulting in SMS not delivering for hours and days after being sent or not even delivering at all despite the confirmation of sent on the sender’s phone. POS terminal operators have had and still have running battles with their customers on the issue of money transfer for payments or to banks accounts which was sent and confirmed delivered on the system, but which the receipent never received and consequently resulted in the matter going to the police station for resolution or even resulted in physical fight and the attendant disruption of public peace and severance of relationships. At times, when you deposit or transfer money into and from bank accounts within the financial institutions physically or online, you don’t receive alert for hours and days, only through persistent calls from the would be receipent of non delivery, would you realize that the transaction was aborted and the transfer cancelled with the money returned and in some cases, you have to go to the bank for resolution of such a transaction. As a Nigerian, we have had instances where even in your location, one is left stranded because the network suddenly went down and one cannot make quality calls or send messages for hours and even for some days, only for you later to receive an apology SMS from the service providers for the inconveniences caused by system breakdown or disruption.

A stark reality of our state of national affairs today is that our society suffers from trust deficit. Imagine a situation in which election has been concluded in a location and results that have been transmitted electronically say from 4.30pm, is now delivered and acknowledged at 7pm same day or even beyond because of technical hitches, poor or lack of coverage or natural factors? Definitely, the swan song from the party that lost the election and it supporters would be that the result has been manipulated, even when they know that is not the case and instead of being responsible to acknowledge the technological deficiency, they would continue with their cries of mischief just to gain public sympathy and undermine the process for political capital.

If Mr. Festus Okoye statement that INEC has the capacity to transmit election results electronically is to be taken as the gospel truth, then persons and financial institutions won’t be at the receiving end of financial fraud by criminals who continue to perpetuate their criminality by exploiting the loopholes in the man-made telecommunication system globally for which the service providers themselves have no absolute control.

As it stands, INEC does not have its own telecomunication connectivity to transmit elections results from whichever area within Nigeria that Mr. Okoye is talking about confidently without substance, INEC is going to rely a third party, the GSM service providers for a platform for which there is no part of the 36 states and the federal capital territory of Nigeria that does not suffer from zero, poor, unreliable, susceptible to weather fluctuations and even manipulations by evil minded persons and groups which have resulted in untoward consequences on humanity.

The attempt to politicize this serious area of our engagement by persons and groups is very unfortunate and sad. The only difference between electronic transmission of results and the manual transmission is the issue of time. The time limitations of the manual transmission that ought to be a source of concern is by far better than the electronic transmission of election results which is also susceptible to manipulations with the reality on ground.

For example, we presently operate a manual transmission of results in which election results are publicly announced at the polling stations and party agents and security agencies sign the results sheets and receive copies and it is pasted publicly at the polling station before the onward transmission. Even when this process is carried out transparently and creditably in the full glare of the stakeholders, we have had and will continue to have situations where a party agent because after the final sorting and counting of ballot papers according to votes scored by parties, recognizing that his party has been defeated, refuse to sign the results sheets or disappear from signing just to undermine the credibility of the process and he and other party faithfuls and supporters continue to sing the song mischievous cries that they have been robbed at the polls without proof, whereas it is not true. Can you compare the scenario above with an electronic transmission of results which would be executed by only the electoral umpire? Definitely, this is nothing but an invitation to anarchy knowing that the mindset of the average human being for mischief and wolf cries is legendary.

Also, in the case of electoral disputes, how can an aggrieved candidate and party pursue it’s case at the courts with facts if for example, the primary source of data used in transferring the election result is stolen, missing or damaged? This electronic transmission of result has the tendency to undermine the conflict resolution mechanism of our electoral system which is against the tenets of fairness and justice even in election matters.

Today, because of the advancement we have made in our electoral system, at election time, even with the manual transmission of results, the voters are kings as the political party justle with one another to curry their votes through financial and other forms of inducement before election that we derisively referred to as “Di ibo, ko se obe” meaning “Vote and cook soup” at one of the staggered gubernatorial elections only recently in which we waged a war and are still on it against vote buying. With this electronic transmission of election results campaign being waged at all front, one suspect that the king role of the voters would be displaced with that of hackers as politicians are capable of doing anything to get to power at all cost. Also, what guarantee can the GSM services providers  initiate to protect the system against vandalism and disruption of telecommunication system in areas which agents of party A believe is the stronghold of party B to prevent electronic transmission of results?

To those who are fraudulently mouthing and confusing the uninformed that electronic transmission of election result would eliminate manipulation and ballot snatching, this is very untrue. Electronic transmission of results can only happen after the conclusion of election in which ballot papers thumbprinted by voters at the polls have been sorted and counted, if ballot box containing ballot papers is snatched and or damaged, what would be counted and transmitted as election results electronically?

We must at this juncture, express our disappointment with honourable legislators who made the right and realistic decision of voting against electronic transmission of election results for now, but have according to reports, been coming out to deny doing such as a result of the relentless campaign of blackmail and calumny against their patriotic and nationalistic decision to save Nigeria from descending into intended chaos by the insistence on this amendment from some unfortunately concerned and mischievous quarters, whether we have the infrastructure on ground or not to operate it, but have adopted the slogan of just do it for whatever it means. Critical public decision are very bitter and painstaking decision that must be fought and defended with facts no matter whose ox is gored.

The progress made so far in our electoral system has caused untold pain and inconvenience to beneficiaries of the old system, today, we have a PVC and card reader system in place to check manipulation of voting by proxy, even though we are not there yet, the electronic transmission of results is fraught with landmines of hackers, zero and poor telecommunication connectivity of which the country suffers from unreliable and porous service which can be exploited to undermine our election and national security.

To the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), election results  is a national security information which for the sake of national security should not be transmitted through a third party which the GSM service providers  platform represents and because of the inherent dangers it portends in the short and long term, don’t plunge Nigeria into chaos by trying to be politically correct, it is dangerous to our collective humanity.

Politics

Are You Better Off? Two Years On, Nigerians Ask Hard Questions

Published

on

Are You Better Off? Two Years On, Nigerians Ask Hard Questions

Are You Better Off? Two Years On, Nigerians Ask Hard Questions

 

Two years after this administration took office, Nigerians are confronted with a hard and unavoidable question: are we truly better off? For many households, the answer is no. The cost of living has risen sharply, purchasing power has collapsed, and daily survival has become a struggle. What was promised as renewed hope now feels like renewed hardship, especially for ordinary Nigerians who bear the brunt of economic decisions.

Since 2024, an estimated 14 million more Nigerians have slipped into poverty, pushing the total number of people living below the poverty line to about 129 million. This is not just a statistic but a human tragedy. It speaks to empty kitchens, withdrawn children, shuttered small businesses, and families forced to choose between food, education, and healthcare. At such a moment, leadership is expected to respond with empathy, urgency, and clear welfare policies. Instead, Nigerians hear promises without visible plans or measurable outcomes.

History offers a powerful contrast. Chief Obafemi Awolowo built his leadership on a simple philosophy: the welfare of the people must come first. His introduction of free universal primary education in the Western Region transformed literacy and opportunity, while free healthcare for children and disciplined public finance proved that social welfare and fiscal responsibility can coexist. His vision showed that government exists to lift the many, not protect the few.

That tradition of people centred governance did not end with Awolowo. In recent years, the Buhari administration rolled out the largest social investment programme in Nigeria’s history. Initiatives such as N Power, conditional cash transfers, school feeding, and trader support schemes reached millions of vulnerable Nigerians. While imperfect, these programmes acknowledged poverty as a national emergency and treated welfare as a core responsibility of government.

At the state level, examples from Osun and Kaduna reinforced the same lesson. In Osun, Rauf Aregbesola prioritised youth employment, school feeding, social welfare for the elderly, digital learning tools, and massive school infrastructure, earning national and international recognition. In Kaduna, Nasir El Rufai expanded free education, scholarships, healthcare access, and women empowerment programmes, proving that subnational governments can deliver real social protection when there is political will.

Aregbesola’s administration launched the Osun Elementary School Feeding and Health Programme (O-MEALS), which provided daily meals to over 250,000 pupils in public primary schools across the state. The programme directly empowered more than 3,000 local food vendors and caterers, most of them women, while creating a steady market for local farmers, especially poultry farmers, vegetable growers, and food suppliers. Beyond improving school attendance and nutrition for pupils, O-MEALS reduced the financial burden on parents and injected income into rural economies. Complementing this was the O-YES youth empowerment scheme, which engaged about 40,000 young people in public works, community services, and vocational training. Massive investments in modern school infrastructure, digital learning tools (Opon Imo), social welfare support for the elderly, and health initiatives earned Osun national and international recognition. These interventions demonstrated that with political will, subnational governments can protect the vulnerable, stimulate local economies, and deliver inclusive development even in fiscally constrained environments.

Are You Better Off? Two Years On, Nigerians Ask Hard Questions ;

These policies are not distant memories or theoretical ideas. They are recent, verifiable interventions that improved lives and expanded opportunity. They demonstrate that governance rooted in compassion, planning, and accountability can soften economic shocks and protect the vulnerable, even in difficult times.

Today, many Nigerians feel abandoned by a system that appears more responsive to elites than to the masses. The absence of strong, visible welfare policies in the face of rising poverty raises a troubling question about our national priorities. A society that allows suffering to deepen without intervention risks losing not just stability, but its moral compass.

Nigeria must return to a simple principle: leadership exists to serve the people. A country where the child of a poor family has the same chance as the child of the powerful is not built by slogans, but by deliberate policies. Nigerians must demand better governance, resist the temptation to trade their votes for short term gain, and insist on a future where leadership truly cares.

Continue Reading

Politics

A Nation in Distress: How APC’s Years in Power Have Deepened Nigeria’s Crisis

Published

on

A Nation in Distress: How APC’s Years in Power Have Deepened Nigeria’s Crisis

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com

 

“A Nation at the Brink — Why APC’s Failures Demand a New Political Direction.”

 

Nigeria stands today at a perilous crossroads with economically strained, socially fragmented and morally wounded. The promise that once accompanied the rise of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has given way to widespread disillusionment. What was sold as a vehicle for national renewal has, in reality, become a synonym for hardship, division and stagnation. This is not hyperbole. It is the sobering verdict of millions of citizens whose lived realities speak louder than partisan spin.

 

From the economy to national unity, from domestic politics to global standing, from tribal tensions to religious relationships, the APC’s record has been a catalogue of missed opportunities and deepening crises. Nigeria deserves better. Nigerians deserve another party, one that puts the people above politics, unity above division and progress above self-interest.

ECONOMIC DECLINE: Hunger, Poverty, and Eroded Hope.

The heart of any nation’s stability is its economy. On this front, the APC’s performance has been deeply disappointing. Bold reforms such as the removal of fuel subsidies and foreign exchange liberalisation were touted as necessary moves to stabilise the economy and attract investment. Yet, for millions of ordinary Nigerians, these policies have translated into unbearable hardship. Prices of essential goods have soared, inflation has blasted household budgets and poverty has become entrenched in everyday life.

 

Critics inside and outside Nigeria point to a stark reality: despite claims of economic recovery, the benefits remain out of reach for the majority. Food inflation, transport costs and the cost of living have escalated beyond what most families can afford. Various reports highlight that poverty and food insecurity have worsened, even as macroeconomic figures are debated.

 

As economist and social critic Ha-Joon Chang once reminded the world, “An economy’s success should be measured by how its most vulnerable citizens fare, not by abstract figures on paper.” Today, Nigeria’s most vulnerable are sinking deeper into deprivation.

 

TRIBAL AND RELIGIOUS RELATIONSHIPS: Division Instead of Unity.

Nigeria’s diversity is its strength with a mosaic of peoples, cultures and histories. Yet under the APC, this diversity too often became a source of division rather than a foundation for unity. Competing ethnic interests have periodically been manipulated for political advantage, reopening old wounds and aggravating suspicions between communities. Observers have noted that political rhetoric and strategic statements have at times undermined national cohesion, diverting attention from governance failures to age-old regional tensions.

 

A healthy polity celebrates differences while forging shared purpose. A government should foster cooperation across tribes and religions not exploit fault lines for political survival. Nigerian scholar and author Wole Soyinka’s enduring wisdom resonates here: “The greatest threat to a nation is the corruption of its conscience.” A leadership that fuels division corrodes the moral fabric of the nation.

A Nation in Distress: How APC’s Years in Power Have Deepened Nigeria’s Crisis

By George Omagbemi Sylvester

REGIONAL RELATIONSHIPS: Neglect and Fragmentation.

A nation for the people must not be a nation divided. Though many Nigerians feel left behind. Regions that should be engines of growth have languished under policies that prioritise political expediency over structural development. The promise of balanced regional development has often been drowned by centralised decision-making that pays lip service to inclusivity but delivers little in tangible benefits.

 

Nigeria’s unity must be more than rhetoric; it must be reflected in policy outcomes, improved infrastructure and equitable opportunities for all regions. When citizens feel marginalised or unheard, the very idea of a united nation weakens.

 

PARTY RELATIONSHIPS: Internal Disarray and Erosion of Trust.

Political parties thrive on discipline, vision and inclusive leadership. Yet the APC has struggled with internal cohesion. Public disputes, defections and power struggles have underscored deeper conflicts over direction and purpose. Instead of engaging critics with constructive dialogue, party rhetoric too often resorts to personal attacks and defensive posturing, closing off spaces for genuine critique and reform.

 

Strong parties are not built on silencing dissent but on embracing diverse viewpoints and using them to strengthen policy and practice. The APC’s internal dynamics reflect a larger problem: a disconnect between leadership and the lived experiences of citizens.

 

THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY: Compromise Over Accountability.

A robust legislature is a cornerstone of democratic governance — a check on executive power and a voice for the people. Yet, under APC dominance, the National Assembly has often appeared more an instrument of acquiescence than one of accountability. Rather than provide independent oversight, it has been criticised for aligning too closely with executive priorities, even when those priorities fail to address fundamental public needs.

 

Democracy is not measured by elections alone but by the capacity of institutions to hold leaders to account and to represent the interests of all citizens not just a political elite.

 

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Reputational Strains and Missed Opportunities.

On the global stage, Nigeria’s voice once carried remarkable moral weight in Africa and beyond. Though when domestic weaknesses are projected internationally (from economic instability to insecurity) that voice diminishes. Diplomatic engagement demands a strong, confident nation, secure in its foundations and clear in its values.

 

While governments change and global dynamics shift, a consistent lesson from international relations scholars is that credibility comes from internal strength. A nation beset by internal anxieties cannot project the confidence needed to lead on the world stage.

 

HUMANITY FIRST: Policies That Hurt the People.

Above all, governance must centre on human dignity. When policies deepen suffering, particularly for the most vulnerable, leadership has lost its moral compass. The APC era has witnessed protests, public frustration and grassroots movements demanding dignity and relief from hardship. The “End Bad Governance” protests, for example, were driven by widespread discontent with rising hunger and economic distress with realities far removed from official narratives of ‘RECOVERY’.

 

True leadership listens first to the voices of its people not to spin doctors or political strategists.

 

THE TIME FOR CHANGE IS NOW.

This is not an indictment born of bitterness, it is a call to action. Nigeria deserves a politics that places the welfare of citizens above all else. A politics that unites rather than divides. A politics that fosters prosperity, justice and opportunity for every Nigerian.

 

Renowned Nigerian historian and scholar Chinua Achebe once wrote that “Until the lion learns to write, every story will glorify the hunter.” It is time for Nigerians themselves (not the political elite) to reclaim the narrative of this nation.

 

The APC’s record across economy, unity, governance and leadership is a compelling reason to consider another party with one that builds bridges, uplifts citizens and strengthens institutions. Nigeria’s journey toward greatness cannot wait another decade in the hands of leaders who promise change but deliver distress.

 

Let this be the clarion call for a new chapter with one defined by responsibility, humanity, and genuine progress.

 

A Nation in Distress: How APC’s Years in Power Have Deepened Nigeria’s Crisis

By George Omagbemi Sylvester

Continue Reading

Politics

Governor Dauda Lawal Commissions Key Strategic Projects in Tsafe LGA, Commits to Responsive Development

Published

on

Governor Dauda Lawal Commissions Key Strategic Projects in Tsafe LGA, Commits to Responsive Development

In a significant display of commitment to the people of Zamfara State, Governor Dauda Lawal emphasized the importance of development that is not only visible but also functional and responsive to the community’s needs. On Friday, he inaugurated five pivotal projects in the Tsafe Local Government Area, aimed at enhancing the quality of life for residents and bolstering local infrastructure.

According to a statement released by the governor’s spokesperson, Sulaiman Bala Idris, the projects unveiled include a fully reconstructed modern motor park, a refurbished market, a rehabilitated educational institution, an upgraded and equipped general hospital, and a renovated emir’s palace. Each of these initiatives plays a crucial role in various aspects of community life, encompassing leadership, education, healthcare, commerce, and mobility. The governor underscored that these projects are designed not only to serve practical needs but also to instill a sense of pride and ownership among the residents.

During the commissioning ceremony, Governor Lawal highlighted that these five facilities represent the commitment of his administration to fortify public institutions, revitalize infrastructure, and enhance the palpable impact of governance on the populace. “The reconstructed Emir’s Palace in Tsafe stands as a symbol of continuity, authority, and cultural identity,” he stated. He further noted the essential role of traditional institutions in grassroots governance, underscoring their function as peacemakers, custodians of values, and community partners. “This palace’s reconstruction reflects our respect for tradition and acknowledges the pivotal role of traditional rulers in maintaining harmony, resolving conflicts, and fostering unity. Our administration will continue to collaborate with these trusted allies to rebuild and rejuvenate Zamfara State.”

In addressing the issues of education and human capital development, the governor declared, “The College of Health Technology in Tsafe plays a critical role in training health professionals who provide essential care to the community. By enhancing the school’s environment and infrastructure, we are investing in the future competence and confidence of these future health workers. Renovating this college strengthens our healthcare foundation and supports the development of a skilled, service-oriented workforce.”

Linked to these educational improvements is the comprehensive rehabilitation and re-equipping of the General Hospital in Tsafe, a vital secondary healthcare facility that serves as a bridge between primary and specialized medical care. The governor explained that these upgrades are intended to elevate service delivery and enhance patient experiences while providing much-needed support to healthcare workers. “Access to quality healthcare is a top priority for our administration, and we are fully committed to strengthening health facilities across the state,” he added.

Governor Lawal also spoke about the economic implications of the newly inaugurated facilities. “Economic activity is the engine of growth, employment, and stability within our communities. The Tsafe Market and Motor Park are integral to the local economy, serving as hubs for trade, supporting farmers, vendors, artisans, and small business owners. The motor park not only connects communities but also facilitates broader economic exchanges. By enhancing these facilities, we are promoting productivity, ensuring order, and enabling sustainable livelihoods. These improvements not only boost local revenue but also promote safety and uphold the dignity of all users.”

In a call to action, the governor urged all stakeholders including traditional leaders, community members, traders, transport operators, healthcare professionals, and local authorities to take collective ownership of the newly commissioned facilities. “Public infrastructure thrives where there is a shared sense of responsibility and civic duty. Proper utilization and care of these facilities will ensure they effectively serve the community for many years to come,” he concluded, reinforcing the need for continued cooperation in maintaining and protecting these vital resources.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending