Connect with us

society

ASSAULT TODAY, AMBASSADOR TOMORROW; WHAT NATION DOES THIS? (Rewarding misconduct: What are we teaching future generations?

Published

on

ASSAULT TODAY, AMBASSADOR TOMORROW; WHAT NATION DOES THIS? (Rewarding misconduct: What are we teaching future generations?)

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | SaharaWeeklyNG

On August 5, 2025, a ValueJet aircraft preparing to taxi at Abuja’s Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport was brought to a needless standstill. Viral clips showed Fuji icon Wasiu Ayinde Marshal (KWAM 1) on the tarmac amid a confrontation that aviation authorities later described as an egregious breach of airport protocol. Within days, the Federal Government (through the Aviation Minister, Festus Keyamo) announced that KWAM 1’s penalty would be reduced and that he would be engaged as an “AVIATION SECURITY/PROTOCOL AMBASSADOR.”

In the same news cycle, Comfort Emmanson, a passenger on an Ibom Air flight who allegedly assaulted airline staff after refusing to switch off her phone, was banned by airline operators and faced swift legal consequences, only for public statements to float the idea that she, too, could be tapped in some “GOOD CONDUCT” ambassadorial role. The mere suggestion made a mockery of deterrence and sent a gale-force signal of mixed values.

This is not a trivial spat. It is about whether Nigeria still believes in consequences that fit the offense; especially in aviation, where one person’s unruly behavior can ripple into safety risks for all. International and Nigerian rules are unambiguous: DISRUPTIVE CONDUCT THAT THREATENS SAFETY OR ORDER (on the ground or in the cabin) is an offense with legal and administrative penalties. ICAO’s regime (Tokyo Convention 1963, strengthened by the Montreal Protocol 2014) and Nigeria’s Civil Aviation Regulations outline clear enforcement powers for pilots, security agencies and regulators.

The facts we cannot spin
Abuja/ValueJet incident (Aug 5, 2025): The Minister confirmed the episode and initially announced sanctions before reducing KWAM 1’s ban to one month and positioning him for an awareness role. The NCAA complaint to the police was also withdrawn. Critics (including industry voices and public commentators) condemned the optics.

Ibom Air confrontation(Aug 10, 2025): Emmanson allegedly struck crew and resisted removal; she was banned by airlines and faced arraignment. International outlets highlighted the severity of the assault claims and the safety implications of defying crew instructions.

The law is clear: Nigeria’s Civil Aviation Regulations list “UNRULY PASSENGER BEHAVIOR” as an offense, with penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment; ICAO’s framework empowers the pilot-in-command to restrain and disembark disruptive passengers and encourages states to prosecute. These are not suggestions; they are safety architecture.
Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority.

ASSAULT TODAY, AMBASSADOR TOMORROW; WHAT NATION DOES THIS? (Rewarding misconduct: What are we teaching future generations?)
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | SaharaWeeklyNG

Why the “AMBASSADOR” gambit is dangerous?
1) IT DILUTES DETERRENCE. Aviation safety depends on predictability: follow crew instructions, respect sterile areas and never interfere with aircraft operations. When high-profile violators are swiftly recast as “AMBASSADORS,” we create a perverse incentive structure. The public perceives misbehavior as a shortcut to attention or soft landings. As IATA warns, unruly and disruptive behavior threatens safety, diverts flights and endangers crew and passengers; awareness campaigns are useful, but they must sit on a firm base of credible enforcement.

2) IT UNDERMINES RULE-OF-LAW SYMMETRY. The uneven treatment between an influential celebrity and an ordinary passenger corrodes trust. When the powerful appear to skate past consequences, citizens infer that the law is not a shield for all but a ladder for the few. Former Aviation Minister Osita Chidoka captured the zeitgeist: episodes of celebrities blocking aircraft or passengers assaulting crew are symptoms of a deeper state dysfunction when public order is not impartially upheld.

3) IT CONTRADICTS THE GLOBAL SAFETY TREND. The Montreal Protocol 2014 exists precisely because states needed stronger jurisdiction to prosecute unruly passengers landing in their territory. Many jurisdictions are tightening penalties, not lightening them; because one incident can cascade into injuries, diversions and millions in losses. Nigeria should align with this arc of seriousness.

The better path: CREDIBLE SANCTIONS FIRST, EDUCATION SECOND.
There is nothing wrong with using high-visibility figures for public education; after accountability is done. Indeed, the Minister later clarified that such roles are voluntary awareness efforts, not paid sinecures. But timing is everything. Turning transgressors into teachers within days flirts with impunity’s theater. Education should reinforce deterrence not replace it.

A principled sequence would look like this:

Complete investigations and apply proportionate sanctions under NCAA regulations (fines, bans or prosecution as appropriate) without fear or favor.

Publicly disclose outcomes with timelines, reinforcing that the same rules bind the titled and the unknown.

Then consider restorative roles (e.g., recording PSAs on “what I did wrong”) that underline, not erase, the lesson.

What message are we sending?
In civil aviation, a single slap, shove or “celebrity moment” can disturb cockpit focus, inflame crowds and morph into a safety incident. Cabin crew orders are not suggestions; they are a safety chain. A society that trivializes breaches in this chain is playing dice with lives.

Political philosopher Montesquieu warned that “there is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice.” When symbols of “AMBASSADORSHIP” are bestowed before justice is seen to be done, we twist the shield. Martin Luther King Jr. taught that “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” When the runway becomes a stage for preferential treatment, we rehearse injustice in the most unforgiving theater: a system where physics (not politics) has the last word.

The exasperation from stakeholders is not hysteria. Industry groups have repeatedly flagged the rising tide of disruptive behavior, urging stricter enforcement and public education working in tandem. Nigerian commentators and aviation lawyers have, in recent days, laid out chapter and verse of our laws, ICAO guidance and pilot authority. The theme is unmistakable: consequences must be certain.

Concrete steps Nigeria should take now are:
1) Lock in the legal backbone. Ensure domestic law fully leverages the Montreal Protocol 2014’s expanded jurisdiction so that incidents landing on Nigerian soil meet timely prosecution. Publish (ahead of time) the charge sheets and sentencing guidelines for common unruly offenses to remove guesswork.

2) Standardize penalties and publish them prominently. The NCAA should maintain an always-current, public schedule of penalties for unruly behavior (e.g., obstruction of operations, assault on crew, non-compliance with safety instructions), and stick to it. This clarity deters, guides prosecutors and shields against ad-hoc leniency.

3) Mandate “cooling-off” periods before any advocacy roles. If, for restorative justice, a wrongdoer is later used for public education, a fixed moratorium (say, 12–18 months after sanctions are satisfied) should be required. This preserves the moral sequence: accountability, then advocacy.

4) Crew-first policy. Assault on cabin crew must trigger automatic arrest referrals and minimum penalties. Pilots must be confident that handing over a disruptive passenger will not dissolve into celebrity exceptionalism at the terminal door.

5) A real public awareness blitz (rooted in accountability. Use airports, airlines, radio and social media to run relentless campaigns on “What counts as unruly,” “Crew authority,” and “Penalties you will face.” IATA’s guidance and international best practice support such campaigns) and they work best when anchored in credible enforcement.

To the youth watching.
Every society teaches by what it rewards. If the impressionable see that a tarmac tantrum or a slap in a cabin ends in a photo-op and a title, they will learn the wrong lesson about power, fame and the rule of law. We do not build a safe aviation culture (or a serious country) by turning transgression into a trampoline.

Edmund Burke cautioned that “example is the school of mankind and they will learn at no other.” Let our example be that no one (artist or artisan, VIP or everyman) stands above the safety rules that keep aluminum tubes full of our mothers and children from turning into headlines.

Ambassadors for safety should be those whose conduct embodies it, not those still stepping out of the dock. If Nigeria wants to cultivate a culture of respect for aviation protocols, our sequence must be simple and non-negotiable: law, consequence, then lesson in that order.

ASSAULT TODAY, AMBASSADOR TOMORROW; WHAT NATION DOES THIS? (Rewarding misconduct: What are we teaching future generations?)
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | SaharaWeeklyNG
Editor’s note: All dates are in August 2025.

society

You Against Crime Founder Tayo Folorunsho Praises Winners of Abuja Schools Festival.

Published

on

You Against Crime Founder Tayo Folorunsho Praises Winners of Abuja Schools Festival.

 

Abuja, Nigeria – The maiden edition of the You Against Crime – Schools Festival 2026 Grand Finale has concluded, marking a significant milestone in youth engagement and crime prevention efforts across the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

The event, held at the University of Abuja, brought together 78 secondary schools from the six Area Councils of Abuja, with the top six schools competing in the Grand Finale.

*Winners Emerge*

Tudunwada School, Bwari took the top spot, followed closely by The Golden Crest Royal in second place, and Government Secondary School, Kuje in third.

*CULTURE, THE CURE FOR CRIME*

The festival’s theme, “Culture, The Cure for Crime,” highlighted the importance of values, identity, mentorship, and positive engagement in preventing crime and shaping responsible citizenship among young people.

*DISTINGUISHED GUEST SPEAKERS*

Auwal Musa Rafsanjani, Chairman, Amnesty International, praised the initiative, saying, “This festival is a beacon of hope for our young people, promoting values and principles that can shape a brighter future for Nigeria.”

Aisha Mohammed, Head of Enlightenment & Re-orientation, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, emphasized the importance of mentorship, stating, “Empowering young people with the right guidance and opportunities is key to preventing crime and building a stronger nation.”

*PARTNERSHIP AND SUPPORT*

The 2026 Grand Finale Edition was proudly sponsored by Civicx Technology Ltd Int’l, reinforcing a shared commitment to youth empowerment and crime prevention through cultural reorientation and innovation.

Tayo Folorunsho, Host & Founder, You Against Crime International, addressing the media and appealed to government agencies to support initiatives like this, targeting young minds early.

You Against Crime International is a movement advocating cultural change as a long-term solution to crime. The organization remains committed to advancing youth development, civic responsibility, and nation-building across Nigeria.

You Against Crime Founder Tayo Folorunsho Praises Winners of Abuja Schools Festival.

Continue Reading

society

TICP Customs Launches Paperless Regime, Warns Against False Declarations

Published

on

TICP Customs Launches Paperless Regime, Warns Against False Declarations

 

The Customs Area Controller of Tin Can Island Port Command of the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), Comptroller Frank Onyeka, has launched a roadmap for the full implementation of a paperless regime at the command.

 

Onyeka disclosed this during a press briefing in Lagos, stating that the command was fully prepared for seamless digital operations ahead of the nationwide rollout scheduled for the second quarter of the year.

 

He described the engagement as the first in a series of consultations aimed at sensitising stakeholders on the strategies, operational framework and expectations under the new regime.

 

The controller commended the media for its constructive reportage since his assumption of office and sought continued collaboration to ensure the success of the initiative.

 

Presenting the command’s performance report, Onyeka said the Tin Can Island Command generated ₦609 billion in revenue in 2025, describing it as the highest in the history of the command.

 

He added that revenue collection rose from ₦116 billion recorded in January of the previous year to ₦145 billion in the corresponding period last month, representing an increase of over ₦29.9 billion.

 

Onyeka stated that his vision was to make the command known for trade efficiency, explaining that under the paperless regime, containers would be released without physical contact between Customs officers and clearing agents, provided declarations were accurate.

 

He credited the Comptroller-General of Customs, Bashir Adewale Adeniyi, for providing the leadership and strategic direction driving modernisation efforts across Customs formations nationwide.

 

The controller urged stakeholders to avoid false declarations and engage directly with the command to resolve concerns, emphasising that transparency and dialogue were essential to achieving efficient port operations.

 

He assured that consignments with clear scanning results and proper documentation would be released promptly, while those flagged by the risk management system would undergo physical examination, adding that the command would continue to collaborate with other agencies to reduce cargo dwell time and enhance port efficiency.

Continue Reading

society

Love on Display: Katie Price and Lee Put On a Public Show of Affection 

Published

on

Love on Display: Katie Price and Lee Put On a Public Show of Affection 

By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG 

British media personality Katie Price is once again at the center of tabloid and public attention after being photographed poolside with her new husband, Lee, in a display of affection that quickly circulated across entertainment platforms. The images, reportedly taken during a recent leisure outing at a private resort location in the United Kingdom, show the couple embracing and kissing beside a swimming pool, with Lee prominently displaying a tattoo tribute dedicated to Price.

 

The photographs, which surfaced in mid-February 2026 through British tabloid outlets, depict the couple appearing relaxed and affectionate. Lee, whose full name has been reported in sections of the UK press but who largely maintains a lower public profile compared to his wife, lifted his arm to reveal a visible tattoo said to be in honor of Price and a gesture widely interpreted as a public affirmation of their relationship.

 

What happened was straightforward but symbolically charged: a public display of affection between newlyweds, amplified by Price’s longstanding celebrity status. Where it happened (poolside at what sources describe as a private holiday setting) underscores the blending of personal life and public spectacle that has long defined Price’s media journey. During a recent February getaway placed it squarely within ongoing tabloid interest surrounding her latest marriage. Price, 47 and her new husband Lee, whose visible tribute tattoo became the focal point of the moment.

 

Celebrity culture scholars argue that public figures such as Price operate within a media ecosystem where visibility sustains relevance. “Modern celebrity is performative intimacy,” explains Professor Graeme Turner, a media and cultural studies scholar known for his work on celebrity culture. “Public displays of affection are not merely private acts; they are communicative gestures that reinforce brand identity and narrative continuity.” In Price’s case, her romantic relationships have long been interwoven with her public persona.

 

Price first rose to prominence in the late 1990s under the glamour model moniker “Jordan,” before transitioning into reality television, publishing and business ventures. Her personal life (including previous marriages and high-profile relationships) has frequently generated headlines in the British press. This latest marriage continues that pattern of intense scrutiny.

 

The tattoo tribute displayed by Lee is particularly significant in celebrity symbolism. Body art dedicated to a partner is often perceived as a declaration of permanence. Dr. Chris Rojek, emeritus professor of sociology and an authority on fame and public identity, has observed that “celebrity relationships are sustained as much through symbolic reinforcement as through private commitment. Visible tokens (rings, tattoos, coordinated appearances) function as public assurances.” In this case, the tattoo serves not merely as personal expression but as a visual narrative device in an already highly mediated relationship.

 

How the moment unfolded (casually but conspicuously) reflects the dynamics of contemporary celebrity coverage. Photographs were reportedly captured either by paparazzi stationed nearby or shared through controlled media access, a common practice in the British entertainment industry. Within hours, the images were republished by multiple outlets, accompanied by commentary on Price’s relationship history and ongoing legal and financial challenges, issues that have previously placed her under intense public scrutiny.

 

Despite recurring controversy throughout her career, Price remains a resilient media figure. Communications analyst Mark Borkowski has previously remarked in interviews that “Katie Price understands publicity better than most. Whether by design or instinct, she maintains a feedback loop with the press that keeps her culturally visible.” The poolside photographs appear to fit squarely within that established pattern of managed exposure and reactive media amplification.

 

Critically, there is no indication of misconduct, public disturbance or controversy tied directly to the poolside display itself. It was, by all verified accounts, a consensual and celebratory expression of affection between married adults. The wider attention it has generated speaks less to the act and more to the individuals involved; particularly Price’s enduring position within British popular culture.

 

For global audiences, the episode illustrates a broader truth about contemporary fame: private milestones often become public commodities. The marriage of Katie Price and Lee (and the symbolic tattoo that now marks it) has become another chapter in a life lived persistently under the camera’s gaze.

 

As celebrity culture continues to blur boundaries between intimacy and publicity, moments like this poolside embrace are no longer trivial snapshots. They are narrative events, reinforcing identity, commitment and brand continuity in equal measure.

Continue Reading

Cover Of The Week

Trending