Business
The World at a Breaking Point: How Geopolitics, Climate Collapse and Food Insecurity Are Forging a Global Emergency
The World at a Breaking Point: How Geopolitics, Climate Collapse and Food Insecurity Are Forging a Global Emergency.
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by saharaweeklyng.com
“Why the G20 can no longer tinker at the edges – it must act boldly and now.”
“GEOPOLITICAL TENSIONS, GLOBAL WARMING, PANDEMICS, ENERGY and FOOD INSECURITY jeopardise our collective future.” Those were not idle words from President Cyril Ramaphosa at the opening of the G20 Leaders Summit in Johannesburg; they were an urgent alarm bell for a global order fraying at the seams. South Africa’s presidency put its finger on what every honest analyst, humanitarian and climate scientist already knows, multiple, interacting crises are converging to create a cascade of risk that threatens lives, economies and the political stability of entire regions.
This is not hyperbole. The world is seeing an uncomfortable and brutal arithmetic: geopolitical conflict and economic fragmentation reduce the flow of goods, cut investment and corrode cooperation; climate change undermines harvests, water supplies and coastal livelihoods; and food insecurity (driven by war, weather shocks and runaway inflation) is spiking in the places least able to cope. The UN-led State of Food Security and Nutrition report and contemporaneous UN analyses show that hundreds of millions remain undernourished and that while global hunger edged down overall, it rose sharply in much of Africa and western Asia. That divergence is lethal and politically combustible.
The mechanics of the crisis are simple and merciless. Geopolitical tensions (trade wars, sanctions, blockades and military conflict) rip apart integrated supply chains that keep food, fertiliser and energy moving. When ports close, fertiliser becomes scarce and grain prices spike. When currencies collapse under the weight of sanctions or poor macroeconomic policy, millions lose the purchasing power to buy calories. At the same time, climate extremes (drought, floods, heatwaves) are reducing yields and increasing volatility in staple food production, consuming resilience faster than it can be rebuilt. The latest scientific syntheses make plain that warming and its knock-on effects are not some distant threat but an immediate multiplier of instability.
Experts who study planetary risk are not whispering, they are shouting warnings. Professor Johan Rockström, a leading authority on planetary boundaries, has repeatedly warned that transgressing critical Earth system thresholds risks irreversible, accelerating changes; the very “TIPPING POINT’S” that would cascade into mass crop failures, ecosystem collapse and mass displacement. “The tipping element that worries me most is coral reef systems,” Rockström has said and that is not just an environmental lament; coral reefs underpin fisheries and coastal protection for hundreds of millions of people. When ecosystems fail, livelihoods vanish overnight.
Humanitarian leaders echo this urgency. At the launch of the 2024–25 global food report, WFP Executive Director Cindy McCain bluntly stated that “one thing is very clear, the world is badly OFF-TRACK in our efforts to achieve Zero Hunger by 2030.” That failure is not a statistic; it is a moral indictment of global choices: insufficient financing, a shortfall of multilateral cooperation, and a failure to insulate vulnerable countries from shocks. The Global Report on Food Crises and related UN assessments put numbers to the suffering: in 2024, crisis-level acute food insecurity affected tens of millions more people than the year before, with conflict and climate extremes the main drivers.
So what does this mean for governance at the G20 and for global leaders who can still shape outcomes? First, the era of incrementalism is over. Patchwork measures and symbolic statements will not stabilise food systems in the face of simultaneous geopolitical and climatic shocks. The G20 must mobilise large, guaranteed financing for adaptive agriculture, targeted social protection, emergency food reserves and rapid fertiliser distribution mechanisms that bypass geopolitical chokepoints. It must also create contingency credit lines and debt-service suspensions that prevent vulnerable states from choosing between feeding their people and paying creditors. The evidence is clear: well-targeted social protection and local agricultural investment are among the most cost-effective ways to reduce hunger and build resilience.
Second, climate action has to be reframed as a security imperative, not merely an emissions accounting exercise. The IPCC’s synthesis makes this plain: unmitigated warming amplifies risks across agriculture, water, health and migration; every fraction of a degree matters for harvest reliability. That is why developing countries must receive immediate and predictable finance for adaptation; not loan-based stopgaps, but grants and concessional financing for climate-smart irrigation, soil restoration, seed systems and disaster-proof storage and transport. Without it, the Global South will continue to pay the price for emissions it did little to cause.
Third, the G20 must reopen the playbook on cooperation. The fragmentation of global governance (boycotts, unilateral sanctions and self-interested blocs) reduces the capacity for joint action where it counts most: humanitarian corridors, collective purchasing of critical inputs, and deconflicted maritime and land corridors for trade. The Johannesburg summit’s adoption of a leaders’ declaration despite diplomatic friction is a positive sign, but words must translate into mechanisms: grain and fertiliser de-risking facilities, coordinated early warning systems, and a G20 compact to stabilise critical commodity markets during geopolitical shocks.
Finally, the moral argument must become operational policy. Development economists remind us that famines and mass hunger are often political choices enabled by governance failures. Nobel laureate Amartya Sen has long argued that democracy, information transparency and entitlements prevent famines; in the present context, global institutions must protect those entitlements across borders by guaranteeing aid flows, supporting local markets and opposing weaponised scarcity. The time for blaming is over; the time for binding, enforceable compacts to protect food systems and essential supplies is now.
This is not a plea for naïve optimism, nor is it a call to surrender national interest. It is a demand for sober realism: the alternative to action is disorder. We are already seeing localized political instability linked directly to food and fuel spikes; we will see more unless the G20 and every major economy treat climate adaptation, food security and conflict de-escalation as a unified emergency program. If multilateral institutions are to retain legitimacy, they must be capable of delivering rapid, predictable assistance precisely when markets and geopolitics fail.
President Ramaphosa was correct to frame the summit around “PEOPLE, PLANET and PROSPERITY.” Though correct framing without decisive instruments is mere rhetoric. The Johannesburg G20 can be remembered either as the moment the world began to stitch back the frayed fabric of global cooperation, or as yet another summit where urgent warnings dissolved into bland communiqués. Policymakers, financiers and civil society now face a stark choice: treat these converging crises as separate policy silos, or confront them together as the systemic emergency they are. History will judge us by which path we choose.
If we have learned anything from the last decade, it is that crises compound. To avoid a future where food shortages, climate collapse and geopolitical fracture become permanent features of the international system, the G20 must act with the scale, speed and solidarity that this moment demands. Anything less is an act of negligence and the price will be paid in human lives and shattered nations.
George Omagbemi Sylvester is a contributing writer. This piece is published by saharaweeklyng.com.
Business
Deadline of Compliance: Nigeria’s Urgent Call for Tax Return Filing
Deadline of Compliance: Nigeria’s Urgent Call for Tax Return Filing
By George Omagbemi Sylvester | Published by SaharaWeeklyNG.com
“Shift or Structural Demand? A Declaration of Civic Duty in a Nation at a Fiscal Crossroads.”
In the unfolding narrative of national development and economic reform, few instruments are as defining as tax compliance. For Nigeria, a nation perpetually grappling with revenue shortfalls, structural dependency on a single export commodity, and entrenched informal economic behaviour, the Federal Government’s recent clarification on tax return deadlines is not mere bureaucratic noise. It is a deliberate and inescapable declaration: the social contract between citizen and state must be honoured through transparent, lawful and timely tax reporting.
At its core, the government’s pronouncement is stark in its simplicity and radical in its implications. Federal authorities, speaking through the Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele, have made it unequivocally clear that every Nigerian, whether employer or individual taxpayer, must file annual tax returns under the law. This encompasses self-assessment filings by individuals that too many assumed ended once employers deducted pay-as-you-earn taxes from their salaries.
This is not an optional civic suggestion, it is mandatory, backed by statute, and tied to a broader vision of national fiscal responsibility. Citizens can no longer hide behind ignorance, apathy, or false assumptions. “Many people assume that if their employer deducts tax from their salaries, their obligations end there. That is wrong,” Oyedele warned, emphasizing that the obligation to file remains with the individual under both existing and newly reformed tax laws.
The Deadlines and the Reality They Reveal.
Across the federation, state and federal revenue authorities have reaffirmed statutory deadlines in pursuit of compliance. The Lagos State Internal Revenue Service, for instance, moved to extend its filing date for employer returns by a narrow window, reflecting the reality that compliance often lags behind legal timelines. The extension was intended not as leniency, but as a pragmatic effort to allow accurate and complete submissions, underscoring that true compliance rises above mere mechanical ticking of a box.
At the federal level, Oyedele’s intervention was even more fundamental. He reminded Nigerians that annual tax returns for the preceding year must be filed in good faith, with integrity and in respect of the law. This applies regardless of income level including low-income earners who have historically believed that they are outside the tax net. “All of us must file our returns, including those earning low income,” he stated.
Herein lies one of the most challenging truths of contemporary Nigerian governance: widespread tax non-compliance is not just a technical breach of law, it is a deep cultural and structural issue that reflects decades of mistrust between citizens and the state.
The Root of the Problem: Non-Compliance as a Symptom.
Nigeria’s tax culture has long been under scrutiny. Public discourse and economic analysis consistently show that a significant majority of eligible taxpayers do not file annual returns. Oyedele highlighted that even in states widely regarded as tax administration leaders, compliance remains strikingly low, often below five percent.
This widespread non-compliance stems from multiple sources:
A long history of weak tax administration systems, where enforcement was inconsistent and penalties were rarely applied.
A perception that public services do not reflect the taxes collected, eroding the citizenry’s belief in reciprocity.
An informal economy where income often goes unrecorded, making filing seem irrelevant or impossible to many.
Lack of awareness, with many Nigerians genuinely believing that tax liability ends with employer deductions.
The government’s renewed push for compliance directly challenges these perceptions. It signals a shift from voluntary or lax compliance to structured accountability, a stance that aligns with best practices in modern public finance.
Why This Matters: Beyond Deadlines.
At its most profound level, the insistence on tax return filings is about nation-building and shared responsibility.
Scholars of public finance universally agree that a robust tax system is the backbone of sustainable development. As the eminent economist Dr. Joseph E. Stiglitz has observed, “A society that cannot mobilize its own resources through fair taxation undermines both its government’s legitimacy and its capacity to provide for its people.” Filing tax returns is not a mere administrative task, it is a declaration of participation in the collective project of national advancement.
In Nigeria’s context, this declaration carries weight. With the enactment of comprehensive tax reforms in recent years (including unified frameworks for tax administration and enforcement) authorities now possess broader statutory tools to ensure compliance and accountability. These measures, which include electronic filing platforms and stronger enforcement powers, have been framed as fair and equitable, targeting efficiency rather than arbitrariness.
Yet the success of these reforms depends heavily on citizens embracing their civic duties with sincerity. And this depends on mutual trust, the belief that paying taxes yields tangible benefits in infrastructure, education, healthcare, security and social services.
Voices From Experts: Fiscal Responsibility as a Public Ethic.
Tax law experts and economists, reflecting on the compliance push, have underscored a universal theme: taxation without transparency is inequity, but taxation with accountability is empowerment. When managed with fairness, a functional tax system can reduce dependency on volatile revenue sources, stabilise national budgets, and support long-term investment in human capital.
Professor Aisha Bello, a respected authority in fiscal policy, notes that “Tax compliance is not a burden; it is the foundation upon which social contracts are built. A citizen who honours tax obligations affirms the legitimacy of governance and demands better performance in return.”
Similarly, a leading tax scholar, Dr. Emeka Okon, argues that “The era when Nigerians could evade broader tax responsibilities simply because automatic deductions occur at source must end. For a modern economy, every eligible citizen must be part of the formal tax fold not as victims, but as stakeholders.”
These authoritative voices point to an unassailable truth: filing tax returns is both a legal requirement and a moral responsibility, an expression of citizenship in its fullest sense.
Challenges on the Ground: Compliance and Capacity.
While the rhetoric of compliance is compelling, the reality on the ground demands nuanced understanding. Many taxpayers (especially in the informal sector) lack meaningful access to digital platforms and resources for filing returns. For others, the fear of bureaucratic complexity and perceived punitive enforcement deters participation.
The government, for its part, has responded by promoting online systems and pledging greater taxpayer support. Tax authorities are increasingly engaging stakeholders to demystify filing processes, explain requirements and offer assistance. This mix of enforcement and facilitation is essential. As one seasoned revenue specialist observed: “The state cannot compel compliance through force alone; it must earn it through education, simplicity and fairness.”
The Broader Implication: A New Social Compact.
Ultimately, Nigeria’s renewed emphasis on tax return filing transcends administrative deadlines. It is an unequivocal declaration that national development is a shared responsibility, that citizens and state must engage in a transparent, accountable, and reciprocal relationship.
Tax compliance, therefore, becomes far more than a legal act; it becomes a moral claim on the nation’s future.
When citizens file their returns honestly, they affirm their stake in the nation’s destiny. When the government collects taxes transparently and deploys them effectively, it strengthens not only public services but civic trust itself.
In this sense, the deadlines proclaimed by Nigeria’s fiscal authorities mark not an end but a beginning; the beginning of a civic epoch in which accountability replaces apathy, participation replaces indifference and national purpose triumphs over fragmentation.
The road ahead will not be easy. But in demanding compliance, Nigeria is demanding more than tax returns. It is demanding commitment and that, ultimately, is the foundation on which nations are built.
Business
BUA Foods Records 91% Surge in Profit After Tax, Hits ₦508bn in 2025
BUA Foods Records 91% Surge in Profit After Tax, Hits ₦508bn in 2025
By femi Oyewale
Business
Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards
Adron Homes Unveils “Love for Love” Valentine Promo with Exciting Discounts, Luxury Gifts, and Travel Rewards
In celebration of the season of love, Adron Homes and Properties has announced the launch of its special Valentine campaign, “Love for Love” Promo, a customer-centric initiative designed to reward Nigerians who choose to express love through smart, lasting real estate investments.
The Love for Love Promo offers clients attractive discounts, flexible payment options, and an array of exclusive gift items, reinforcing Adron Homes’ commitment to making property ownership both rewarding and accessible. The campaign runs throughout the Valentine season and applies to the company’s wide portfolio of estates and housing projects strategically located across Nigeria.
Speaking on the promo, the company’s Managing Director, Mrs Adenike Ajobo, stated that the initiative is aimed at encouraging individuals and families to move beyond conventional Valentine gifts by investing in assets that secure their future. According to the company, love is best demonstrated through stability, legacy, and long-term value—principles that real estate ownership represents.
Under the promo structure, clients who make a payment of ₦100,000 receive cake, chocolates, and a bottle of wine, while those who pay ₦200,000 are rewarded with a Love Hamper. Payments of ₦500,000 attract a Love Hamper plus cake, and clients who pay ₦1,000,000 enjoy a choice of a Samsung phone or a Love Hamper with cake.
The rewards become increasingly premium as commitment grows. Clients who pay ₦5,000,000 receive either an iPad or an all-expenses-paid romantic getaway for a couple at one of Nigeria’s finest hotels, which includes two nights’ accommodation, special treats, and a Love Hamper. A payment of ₦10,000,000 comes with a choice of a Samsung Z Fold 7, three nights at a top-tier resort in Nigeria, or a full solar power installation.
For high-value investors, the Love for Love Promo delivers exceptional lifestyle experiences. Clients who pay ₦30,000,000 on land are rewarded with a three-night couple’s trip to Doha, Qatar, or South Africa, while purchasers of any Adron Homes house valued at ₦50,000,000 receive a double-door refrigerator.
The promo covers Adron Homes’ estates located in Lagos, Shimawa, Sagamu, Atan–Ota, Papalanto, Abeokuta, Ibadan, Osun, Ekiti, Abuja, Nasarawa, and Niger States, offering clients the opportunity to invest in fast-growing, strategically positioned communities nationwide.
Adron Homes reiterated that beyond the incentives, the campaign underscores the company’s strong reputation for secure land titles, affordable pricing, strategic locations, and a proven legacy in real estate development.
As Valentine’s Day approaches, Adron Homes encourages Nigerians at home and in the diaspora to take advantage of the Love for Love Promo to enjoy exceptional value, exclusive rewards, and the opportunity to build a future rooted in love, security, and prosperity.
-
celebrity radar - gossips6 months agoWhy Babangida’s Hilltop Home Became Nigeria’s Political “Mecca”
-
society6 months agoPower is a Loan, Not a Possession: The Sacred Duty of Planting People
-
Business6 months agoBatsumi Travel CEO Lisa Sebogodi Wins Prestigious Africa Travel 100 Women Award
-
news6 months agoTHE APPOINTMENT OF WASIU AYINDE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS AN AMBASSADOR SOUNDS EMBARRASSING







